Brief Treatments for Cannabis Dependence Findings From a Randomized Multisite Trial

This study evaluated the efficacy of 2 brief interventions for cannabis-dependent adults. A multisite randomized controlled trial compared cannabis use outcomes across 3 study conditions: (a) 2 sessions of motivational enhancement therapy (MET); (b) 9 sessions of multicomponent therapy that included...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of consulting and clinical psychology Vol. 72; no. 3; pp. 455 - 466
Main Authors: Babor, Thomas F, Carroll, Kathleen, Christiansen, Kenneth, Donaldson, Jean, Herrell, James, Kadden, Ronald, Litt, Mark, McRee, Bonnie, Miller, Michael, Roffman, Roger, Solowji, Nadia, Steinberg, Karen, Stephens, Robert, Vendetti, Janice
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Washington, DC American Psychological Association 01-06-2004
APA Service Center
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:This study evaluated the efficacy of 2 brief interventions for cannabis-dependent adults. A multisite randomized controlled trial compared cannabis use outcomes across 3 study conditions: (a) 2 sessions of motivational enhancement therapy (MET); (b) 9 sessions of multicomponent therapy that included MET, cognitive-behavioral therapy, and case management; and (c) a delayed treatment control (DTC) condition. Participants were 450 adult marijuana smokers with a Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (4th ed.; American Psychiatric Association, 1994 ) diagnosis of cannabis dependence. Assessments were conducted at baseline, and at 4, 9, and 15 months postrandomization. The 9-session treatment reduced marijuana smoking and associated consequences significantly more than the 2-session treatment, which also reduced marijuana use relative to the DTC condition. Most differences between treatments were maintained over the follow-up period. Discussion focuses on the relative efficacy of these brief treatments and the clinical significance of the observed changes in marijuana use.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ISSN:0022-006X
1939-2117
DOI:10.1037/0022-006X.72.3.455