Grain trapping by filamentous cyanobacterial and algal mats: implications for stromatolite microfabrics through time

• Published in: Geobiology Vol. 13; no. 5; pp. 409 - 423
• Main Authors: Frantz, C. M., Petryshyn, V. A., Corsetti, F. A.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01-09-2015; Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
• Subjects: Cell Adhesion; Chemical Phenomena; Chlorophyta - growth & development; Chlorophyta - physiology; Cyanobacteria - growth & development; Cyanobacteria - physiology; Geologic Sediments - microbiology; Particulate Matter; Time Factors
• ISSN: 1472-4677; 1472-4669
• DOI: 10.1111/gbi.12145

Archean and Proterozoic stromatolites are sparry or fine‐grained and finely laminated; coarse‐grained stromatolites, such as many found in modern marine systems, do not appear until quite late in the fossil record. The cause of this textural change and its relevance to understanding the evolutionary history of stromatolites is unclear. Cyanobacteria are typically considered the dominant stromatolite builders through time, but studies demonstrating the trapping and binding abilities of cyanobacterial mats are limited. With this in mind, we conducted experiments to test the grain trapping and binding capabilities of filamentous cyanobacterial mats and trapping in larger filamentous algal mats in order to better understand grain size trends in stromatolites. Mats were cut into squares, inclined in saltwater tanks at angles from 0 to 75° (approximating the angle of lamina in typical stromatolites), and grains of various sizes (fine sand, coarse sand, and fine pebbles) were delivered to their surface. Trapping of grains by the cyanobacterial mats depended strongly on (i) how far filaments protruded from the sediment surface, (ii) grain size, and (iii) the mat's incline angle. The cyanobacterial mats were much more effective at trapping fine grains beyond the abiotic slide angle than larger grains. In addition, the cyanobacterial mats actively bound grains of all sizes over time. In contrast, the much larger algal mats trapped medium and coarse grains at all angles. Our experiments suggest that (i) the presence of detrital grains beyond the abiotic slide angle can be considered a biosignature in ancient stromatolites where biogenicity is in question, and, (ii) where coarse grains are present within stromatolite laminae at angles beyond the abiotic angle of slide (e.g., most modern marine stromatolites), typical cyanobacterial‐type mats are probably not solely responsible for the construction, giving insight into the evolution of stromatolite microfabrics through time.