Basin-scale geohydrologic drought flow features of riparian aquifers in the southern Great Plains
Low-streamflow hydrographs from 22 subbasins in the U.S. Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service (USDA-ARS) Washita River Experimental Watershed complex in central Oklahoma were subjected to recession slope analysis; this method, after that of Brutsaert and Nieber [1977], was derived...
Saved in:
Published in: | Water resources research Vol. 34; no. 2; pp. 233 - 240 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
01-02-1998
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Low-streamflow hydrographs from 22 subbasins in the U.S. Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service (USDA-ARS) Washita River Experimental Watershed complex in central Oklahoma were subjected to recession slope analysis; this method, after that of Brutsaert and Nieber [1977], was derived from a Dupuit-Boussinesq formulation for the groundwater outflows from the adjoining phreatic aquifers. The long-time aquifer response characteristics were generally found to be close to linear, and the short-time response characteristics were consistent with Boltzmann similarity. Representative values of the resulting basin-scale effective groundwater parameters were (35 days)-1 for the low-flow extinction coefficient (i.e., a storage half-life of 25 days); 0.021 m2 s-1 for the hydraulic diffusivity, Dh; 0.0035 m2 s-1/2 for the hydraulic desorptivity, Deh 8 x 10-4 ms-1 for the hydraulic conductivity k; and 0.018 for the drainable porosity (or specific yield), f. The variabilities of Dh, Deh, and k from basin to basin could be better represented by the log-normal than by the normal distribution; f could be described nearly equally well by both. The storage half-life is moderately and positively correlated with basin size; in the case of k the correlation is negative but weaker. Any scale dependence of Dh, Deh, and f appears to be negligible |
---|---|
Bibliography: | U10 1997081546 P40 P10 istex:62790CBCB890D337294EE84A9341B42723EF90A1 ark:/67375/WNG-50Z52V2C-J ArticleID:97WR03068 ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 ObjectType-Article-2 ObjectType-Feature-1 |
ISSN: | 0043-1397 1944-7973 |
DOI: | 10.1029/97WR03068 |