Drone-towed controlled-source electromagnetic (CSEM) system for near-surface geophysical prospecting: on instrument noise, temperature drift, transmission frequency, and survey set-up

• Published in: Geoscientific instrumentation, methods and data systems Vol. 11; no. 2; pp. 435 - 450
• Main Authors: Vilhelmsen, Tobias Bjerg, Døssing, Arne
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Gottingen Copernicus GmbH 08-12-2022; Copernicus Publications
• Subjects: Altitude; Archaeology; Broadband; Control equipment; Drift; Drift (instrumentation); Drone aircraft; Drone vehicles; Drones; Electromagnetism; Geophysical methods; Global navigation satellite system; Inertial navigation; Inertial platforms; Instrumentation; Navigation; Navigational satellites; Noise; Noise levels; Noise standards; Permeability; Physical instruments; Polls & surveys; Pollution; Position measurement; Prospecting; Resolution; Sensors; Statistics; Surveying; Surveys; Temperature; Temperature dependence; Towing; Unmanned aerial vehicles
• ISSN: 2193-0864; 2193-0856; 2193-0864
• DOI: 10.5194/gi-11-435-2022

Drone-borne controlled-source electromagnetic (CSEM) systems combine the mobility of airborne systems with the high subsurface resolution in ground
systems. As such, drone-borne systems are beneficial at sites with poor accessibility and in areas where high resolution is needed, e.g. for
archaeological or subsurface pollution investigations. However, drone-borne CSEM systems are associated with challenges, which are not observed to
the same degree in airborne or ground surveys. In this paper, we explore some of these challenges based on an example of a new drone-towed CSEM
system. The system deploys a multi-frequency broadband electromagnetic sensor (GEM-2 uncrewed aerial vehicle, UAV), which is towed 6 m below a drone in a towing-bird
configuration together with a NovAtel GNSS–IMU (global navigation satellite system–inertial measurement unit) unit, enabling centimetre-level position precision and orientation. The results of a number of
controlled tests of the system are presented together with data from an initial survey at Falster (Denmark), including temperature drift, altitude
vs. signal, survey mode signal dependency, and the effect of frequency choice on noise. The test results reveal the most critical issues for our
system and issues that are likely encountered in similar drone-towed CSEM set-ups. We find that small altitude variations (± 0.5 m)
along our flight paths drastically change the signal, and a local height vs. signal correlation is needed to correct near-surface drone-towed CSEM
data. The highest measured impact was −46.2 ppm cm−1 for a transmission frequency of 91 kHz. We also observe a significant increase in the
standard deviation of the noise level up to 500 % when going from one transmission frequency to five. We recommend not to use more than three
transmission frequencies, and the lowest transmission frequencies should be as high as the application allows it. Finally, we find a strong
temperature dependency (up to 32.2 ppm∘C-1), which is not accounted for in
the instrumentation.