Assessing Sites Contaminated with Unexploded Ordnance:  Statistical Modeling of Ordnance Spatial Distribution

More than 40 000 km2 of former military land in the United States are contaminated with unexploded ordnance (UXO). Cleanup costs are estimated to total as much as $140 billion. The amount of contaminated acreage and total costs are likely to increase as the U.S. Department of Defense (DOD) follows t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Environmental science & technology Vol. 40; no. 3; pp. 931 - 938
Main Authors: Macdonald, Jacqueline A, Small, Mitchell J
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Washington, DC American Chemical Society 01-02-2006
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Abstract More than 40 000 km2 of former military land in the United States are contaminated with unexploded ordnance (UXO). Cleanup costs are estimated to total as much as $140 billion. The amount of contaminated acreage and total costs are likely to increase as the U.S. Department of Defense (DOD) follows through on recently announced plans to close an additional 22 domestic military bases. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and DOD disagree on how these sites should be characterized to assess their risks and plan for cleanup. As a result, much potentially valuable land remains idle while remediation decisions are pending. One of the sources of disagreement is how the locations of UXO should be characterized, given that the exact spatial distribution of UXO is unknown in advance of cleanup. In this paper, we propose and test a new model to represent the spatial distribution of UXO. Unlike existing DOD models, the new model accounts for the tendency of UXO to cluster, presumably around targets at which soldiers aimed during training. We fit the cluster model to geographic data on UXO locations at two former military installations and show that it describes key characteristics of the data more accurately than the existing DOD model. We discuss how the choice of a UXO spatial distribution model could affect important decisions about cleaning up and reusing UXO-affected property.
AbstractList More than 40 000 km2 of former military land in the United States are contaminated with unexploded ordnance (UXO). Cleanup costs are estimated to total as much as $140 billion. The amount of contaminated acreage and total costs are likely to increase as the U.S. Department of Defense (DOD) follows through on recently announced plans to close an additional 22 domestic military bases. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and DOD disagree on how these sites should be characterized to assess their risks and plan for cleanup. As a result, much potentially valuable land remains idle while remediation decisions are pending. One of the sources of disagreement is how the locations of UXO should be characterized, given that the exact spatial distribution of UXO is unknown in advance of cleanup. In this paper, we propose and test a new model to represent the spatial distribution of UXO. Unlike existing DOD models, the new model accounts for the tendency of UXO to cluster, presumably around targets at which soldiers aimed during training. We fit the cluster model to geographic data on UXO locations at two former military installations and show that it describes key characteristics of the data more accurately than the existing DOD model. We discuss how the choice of a UXO spatial distribution model could affect important decisions about cleaning up and reusing UXO-affected property.
Using statistical modeling, sites contaminated with unexploded ordnance were explored. Experiments were conducted at two former military training ranges namely, Fort Ord, California, and Tobyhanna State Park, Pennsylvania. In each case, goal was to determine whether the CSR model or the cluster model better characterized the spatial distribution of UXO. It was found that most UXO contamination was the result of the failure of munnitions to detonate after they were fired. The Department of Defence (DOD) and Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) were unable to agree on how to address the uncertainties associated with the distribution of UXO across the site, the associated risk and different cleanup strategies. It is concluded that the factors other than spatial distribution namely, the depth at which the ordnance would be found, the probability that the civilians would encounter UXO, and the probability that the UXO would detonate, must be considered.
More than 40 000 km super(2) of former military land in the United States are contaminated with unexploded ordnance (UXO). Cleanup costs are estimated to total as much as $140 billion. The amount of contaminated acreage and total costs are likely to increase as the U.S. Department of Defense (DOD) follows through on recently announced plans to close an additional 22 domestic military bases. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and DOD disagree on how these sites should be characterized to assess their risks and plan for cleanup. As a result, much potentially valuable land remains idle while remediation decisions are pending. One of the sources of disagreement is how the locations of UXO should be characterized, given that the exact spatial distribution of UXO is unknown in advance of cleanup. In this paper, we propose and test a new model to represent the spatial distribution of UXO. Unlike existing DOD models, the new model accounts for the tendency of UXO to cluster, presumably around targets at which soldiers aimed during training. We fit the cluster model to geographic data on UXO locations at two former military installations and show that it describes key characteristics of the data more accurately than the existing DOD model. We discuss how the choice of a UXO spatial distribution model could affect important decisions about cleaning up and reusing UXO-affected property.
More than 40 000 km2 of former military land in the United States are contaminated with unexploded ordnance (UXO). Cleanup costs are estimated to total as much as $140 billion. The amount of contaminated acreage and total costs are likely to increase as the U.S. Department of Defense (DOD) follows through on recently announced plans to close an additional 22 domestic military bases. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and DOD disagree on how these sites should be characterized to assess their risks and plan for cleanup. As a result, much potentially valuable land remains idle while remediation decisions are pending. One of the sources of disagreement is how the locations of UXO should be characterized, given that the exact spatial distribution of UXO is unknown in advance of cleanup. In this paper, we propose and test a new model to represent the spatial distribution of UXO. Unlike existing DOD models, the new model accounts for the tendency of UXO to cluster, presumably around targets at which soldiers aimed during training. We fit the cluster model to geographic data on UXO locations at two former military installations and show that it describes key characteristics of the data more accurately than the existing DOD model. We discuss how the choice of a UXO spatial distribution model could affect important decisions about cleaning up and reusing UXO-affected property. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]
More than 40,000 km2 of former military land in the United States are contaminated with unexploded ordnance (UXO). Cleanup costs are estimated to total as much as 140 billion dollars. The amount of contaminated acreage and total costs are likely to increase as the U.S. Department of Defense (DOD) follows through on recently announced plans to close an additional 22 domestic military bases. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency(EPA) and DOD disagree on how these sites should be characterized to assess their risks and plan for cleanup. As a result, much potentially valuable land remains idle while remediation decisions are pending. One of the sources of disagreement is how the locations of UXO should be characterized, given that the exact spatial distribution of UXO is unknown in advance of cleanup. In this paper, we propose and test a new model to represent the spatial distribution of UXO. Unlike existing DOD models, the new model accounts for the tendency of UXO to cluster, presumably around targets at which soldiers aimed during training. We fit the cluster model to geographic data on UXO locations at two former military installations and show that it describes key characteristics of the data more accuratelythan the existing DOD model. We discuss how the choice of a UXO spatial distribution model could affect important decisions about cleaning up and reusing UXO-affected property.
Author Macdonald, Jacqueline A
Small, Mitchell J
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Jacqueline A
  surname: Macdonald
  fullname: Macdonald, Jacqueline A
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Mitchell J
  surname: Small
  fullname: Small, Mitchell J
BackLink http://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=17730998$$DView record in Pascal Francis
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16509339$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNqF0UFrFDEUB_AgFbutHvwCMggKHkaTySSZ9Fa21Qq1FXcL3kI2edHU2WSdZLC9efVr-knMsssu6MHTEN6PP_P-7wgdhBgAoacEvya4IW8gYUYI7_IDNCGswTXrGDlAE4wJrSXlnw_RUUq3GOOG4u4ROiScYUmpnKB4mhKk5MOXauYzpGoaQ9ZLH3QGW_3w-Wt1E-Bu1Udb3teDDToYOPn981c1yzr7lL3RffWhjPt1SHQ7VM1WBZThWVGDX4zZx_AYPXS6T_Bk-z1GN2_P59OL-vL63fvp6WWtW0lz7XTHhKSMa2idNs5aIQxrDXNcd-D4ggtrO8NsJ1vegnMYWt1aMEQC4bajx-jlJnc1xO8jpKyWPhnoex0gjkk1mLWCEfxfSFrBGyabAp__BW_jOISyhCqtkkYITgt6tUFmiCkN4NRq8Es93CuC1fpWanerYp9tA8fFEuxebo9TwIst0KmU7IbSqk97JwTFUq53rTeu9Ax3u7kevikuqGBq_nGmPpGr6fzsQqirfa42ab_Evz_4BweFu2c
CODEN ESTHAG
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1111_risa_12660
crossref_primary_10_1007_s13253_020_00387_2
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_teac_2020_e00088
crossref_primary_10_1021_es071106y
crossref_primary_10_1021_es8014106
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00253_010_2830_x
crossref_primary_10_3390_ijgi9120713
crossref_primary_10_3390_jof10020094
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00477_007_0205_3
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00477_007_0206_2
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00477_007_0212_4
crossref_primary_10_1080_13669877_2013_788055
Cites_doi 10.1002/9781119115151
10.1021/es012463q
10.1201/9781420035414
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright Copyright © 2006 American Chemical Society
2006 INIST-CNRS
Copyright American Chemical Society Feb 1, 2006
Copyright_xml – notice: Copyright © 2006 American Chemical Society
– notice: 2006 INIST-CNRS
– notice: Copyright American Chemical Society Feb 1, 2006
DBID BSCLL
IQODW
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
AAYXX
CITATION
7QO
7ST
7T7
7U7
8FD
C1K
FR3
P64
SOI
7TV
DOI 10.1021/es051168t
DatabaseName Istex
Pascal-Francis
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
CrossRef
Biotechnology Research Abstracts
Environment Abstracts
Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)
Toxicology Abstracts
Technology Research Database
Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management
Engineering Research Database
Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts
Environment Abstracts
Pollution Abstracts
DatabaseTitle MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
CrossRef
Biotechnology Research Abstracts
Technology Research Database
Toxicology Abstracts
Engineering Research Database
Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)
Environment Abstracts
Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts
Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management
Pollution Abstracts
DatabaseTitleList
Environment Abstracts
Pollution Abstracts
Biotechnology Research Abstracts
MEDLINE
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: ECM
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=cmedm&site=ehost-live
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Engineering
Environmental Sciences
Applied Sciences
EISSN 1520-5851
EndPage 938
ExternalDocumentID 991449191
10_1021_es051168t
16509339
17730998
ark_67375_TPS_R1NCTDH7_N
a794651592
Genre Journal Article
Feature
GeographicLocations United States
North America
America
United States--US
USA
GeographicLocations_xml – name: United States
– name: United States--US
– name: USA
GroupedDBID -
.K2
186
1AW
3R3
4.4
4R4
53G
55A
5GY
5VS
63O
7~N
85S
A
AABXI
ABFLS
ABMVS
ABOGM
ABPPZ
ABPTK
ABUCX
ABUFD
ACGFS
ACGOD
ACIWK
ACJ
ACPRK
ACS
AEESW
AENEX
AFEFF
AFRAH
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ANTXH
AQSVZ
BAANH
BKOMP
CS3
DZ
EBS
ED
ED~
EJD
F5P
GNL
IH9
IHE
JG
JG~
K2
K78
LG6
MS
NHB
PQEST
PQQKQ
ROL
RXW
TN5
TWZ
U5U
UHB
UI2
UKR
UNC
UPT
UQL
VF5
VG9
VOH
VQA
W1F
WH7
X
XFK
XZL
YZZ
---
-DZ
-~X
..I
.DC
6TJ
AAHBH
AAYOK
ABJNI
ABQRX
ADHLV
ADMHC
ADUKH
AGXLV
AHGAQ
BSCLL
CUPRZ
GGK
MS~
MW2
XSW
YV5
ZCA
ZCG
~A~
.HR
08R
1WB
42X
8WZ
A6W
ABFRP
ABHMW
ABTAH
ACKIV
AETEA
AFDAS
AGHSJ
IQODW
MVM
OHT
RNS
TAE
UBC
UBX
UBY
VJK
ZY4
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
AAYXX
CITATION
7QO
7ST
7T7
7U7
8FD
C1K
FR3
P64
SOI
7TV
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-a493t-fa8579356ae4facfdd77c54c5f6a8ef6b67dd8c5d89464eff0e4a4dec19e16d83
IEDL.DBID ACS
ISSN 0013-936X
IngestDate Fri Aug 16 09:25:56 EDT 2024
Fri Aug 16 23:26:43 EDT 2024
Thu Oct 10 17:48:08 EDT 2024
Fri Aug 23 01:56:27 EDT 2024
Tue Aug 27 13:50:12 EDT 2024
Sun Oct 22 16:07:55 EDT 2023
Wed Oct 30 09:59:20 EDT 2024
Thu Aug 27 13:42:08 EDT 2020
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 3
Keywords Military installation
Spatial distribution
Decontamination
Decision support system
Risk assessment
Environment impact
Statistical model
Ammunition
Soil pollution
Armament
Military equipment
Language English
License CC BY 4.0
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-a493t-fa8579356ae4facfdd77c54c5f6a8ef6b67dd8c5d89464eff0e4a4dec19e16d83
Notes istex:ED648E08F8146B3A3F8652494C09BAB9D6F2461E
ark:/67375/TPS-R1NCTDH7-N
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
PMID 16509339
PQID 230127763
PQPubID 23462
PageCount 8
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_20547510
proquest_miscellaneous_14762592
proquest_journals_230127763
crossref_primary_10_1021_es051168t
pubmed_primary_16509339
pascalfrancis_primary_17730998
istex_primary_ark_67375_TPS_R1NCTDH7_N
acs_journals_10_1021_es051168t
ProviderPackageCode JG~
55A
AABXI
GNL
VF5
7~N
ACJ
VG9
W1F
ANTXH
ACS
AEESW
AFEFF
.K2
ABMVS
ABUCX
IH9
BAANH
AQSVZ
ED~
UI2
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2006-02-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2006-02-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 02
  year: 2006
  text: 2006-02-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2000
PublicationPlace Washington, DC
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Washington, DC
– name: United States
– name: Easton
PublicationTitle Environmental science & technology
PublicationTitleAlternate Environ. Sci. Technol
PublicationYear 2006
Publisher American Chemical Society
Publisher_xml – name: American Chemical Society
References Fanning A. UXO (es051168tb00015/es051168tb00015_1) 1999
Department of Defense. (es051168tb00004/es051168tb00004_1) 2005
Lawson A. B. (es051168tb00021/es051168tb00021_1) 2002
Ostrouchov G. (es051168tb00023/es051168tb00023_1) 2003
Moller J. (es051168tb00022/es051168tb00022_1) 2002
Army Corps of Engineers. (es051168tb00007/es051168tb00007_1) 2003
Lauritzen E (es051168tb00006/es051168tb00006_1) 2001; 25
MacDonald J. A (es051168tb00013/es051168tb00013_1) 2001; 35
es051168tb00014/es051168tb00014_1
Fields T. (es051168tb00019/es051168tb00019_1) 1999
McKenna S. A. (es051168tb00024/es051168tb00024_1) 2001
MacDonald J. A. (es051168tb00012/es051168tb00012_1) 2003
es051168tb00005/es051168tb00005_1
Diggle P. J. (es051168tb00018/es051168tb00018_1) 2003
es051168tb00001/es051168tb00001_1
McKenna S. A. (es051168tb00025/es051168tb00025_1) 2002
McKenna S. A. (es051168tb00026/es051168tb00026_1) 2003
es051168tb00028/es051168tb00028_1
Defense Science Board (es051168tb00003/es051168tb00003_1) 2003
Cressie N. A. C. (es051168tb00017/es051168tb00017_1) 1993
Pulsipher B. (es051168tb00029/es051168tb00029_1)
Army Corps of Engineers. (es051168tb00027/es051168tb00027_1) 2003
MacDonald J. A. (es051168tb00002/es051168tb00002_1) 2004
Neyman J. (es051168tb00020/es051168tb00020_1); 1958
Heberlein D. C. (es051168tb00010/es051168tb00010_1) 2000
es051168tb00011/es051168tb00011_1
Engelhardt M. (es051168tb00016/es051168tb00016_1) 2000
MacDonald J. A. (es051168tb00008/es051168tb00008_1) 2005
Environmental Protection Agency (es051168tb00009/es051168tb00009_1) 2001
References_xml – volume-title: SERDP Project UX-1200:  Bayesian Approach to UXO Site Characterization with Incorporation of Geophysical Information
  year: 2003
  ident: es051168tb00026/es051168tb00026_1
  contributor:
    fullname: McKenna S. A.
– ident: es051168tb00001/es051168tb00001_1
– volume-title: Handbook on the Manage ment of Ordnance and Explosives at Closed, Transferred, and Transferring Ranges
  year: 2001
  ident: es051168tb00009/es051168tb00009_1
  contributor:
    fullname: Environmental Protection Agency
– volume-title: Fact Sheet
  year: 2003
  ident: es051168tb00027/es051168tb00027_1
  contributor:
    fullname: Army Corps of Engineers.
– volume-title: Spatial Cluster Modeling
  year: 2002
  ident: es051168tb00022/es051168tb00022_1
  contributor:
    fullname: Moller J.
– volume-title: Statistical Analysis of Spatial Point Patterns
  year: 2003
  ident: es051168tb00018/es051168tb00018_1
  contributor:
    fullname: Diggle P. J.
– ident: es051168tb00014/es051168tb00014_1
– ident: es051168tb00005/es051168tb00005_1
– volume: 1958
  start-page: 20
  ident: es051168tb00020/es051168tb00020_1
  publication-title: J. R. Stat. Soc.
  contributor:
    fullname: Neyman J.
– volume-title: Statistics for Spatial Data
  year: 1993
  ident: es051168tb00017/es051168tb00017_1
  doi: 10.1002/9781119115151
  contributor:
    fullname: Cressie N. A. C.
– volume-title: Development of a Database for Ordnance-Related Civilian Accidents:  Final Report
  year: 2003
  ident: es051168tb00007/es051168tb00007_1
  contributor:
    fullname: Army Corps of Engineers.
– volume-title: Progress in Metal-Detection Techniques for Detecting and Identifying Landmines and Unexploded Ordnance
  year: 2000
  ident: es051168tb00010/es051168tb00010_1
  contributor:
    fullname: Heberlein D. C.
– volume-title: Final Report:  Spatial Statistical Models and Optimal Survey Design for Rapid Geophysical Characterization of UXO Sites
  year: 2003
  ident: es051168tb00023/es051168tb00023_1
  contributor:
    fullname: Ostrouchov G.
– volume: 25
  start-page: 39
  issue: 7
  year: 2001
  ident: es051168tb00006/es051168tb00006_1
  publication-title: Military Technol
  contributor:
    fullname: Lauritzen E
– volume-title: Estimating the spatial distribution of UXO from limited data using geostatistics. Presented at the UXO Countermine Forum
  year: 2002
  ident: es051168tb00025/es051168tb00025_1
  contributor:
    fullname: McKenna S. A.
– ident: es051168tb00028/es051168tb00028_1
– volume-title: Report of the Defense Science Board Task Force on Unexploded Ordnance
  year: 2003
  ident: es051168tb00003/es051168tb00003_1
  contributor:
    fullname: Defense Science Board
– volume-title: Statistical Tools for Designing Initial and Post-Removal UXO Characterization Surveys
  ident: es051168tb00029/es051168tb00029_1
  contributor:
    fullname: Pulsipher B.
– volume-title: Alternatives for Landmine Detection
  year: 2003
  ident: es051168tb00012/es051168tb00012_1
  contributor:
    fullname: MacDonald J. A.
– volume-title: Evaluation of U. S. Army Corps of Engineers Statistical UXO Sampling and Characteriza tion Methodologies
  year: 2000
  ident: es051168tb00016/es051168tb00016_1
  contributor:
    fullname: Engelhardt M.
– volume-title: UXO Cleanup Costs:  Implica tions of Alternative Clearance Protocols
  year: 2005
  ident: es051168tb00008/es051168tb00008_1
  contributor:
    fullname: MacDonald J. A.
– ident: es051168tb00011/es051168tb00011_1
– volume: 35
  start-page: 376A
  issue: 17
  year: 2001
  ident: es051168tb00013/es051168tb00013_1
  publication-title: Environ. Sci. Technol
  doi: 10.1021/es012463q
  contributor:
    fullname: MacDonald J. A
– volume-title: AL
  year: 1999
  ident: es051168tb00015/es051168tb00015_1
  contributor:
    fullname: Fanning A. UXO
– volume-title: The Challenge of Transferring Army BRAC Lands Containing Unexploded Ordnance:  Lessons Learned and Options for the Future
  year: 2004
  ident: es051168tb00002/es051168tb00002_1
  contributor:
    fullname: MacDonald J. A.
– volume-title: Defense Environmental Programs Annual Report to Congress Fiscal Year 2004
  year: 2005
  ident: es051168tb00004/es051168tb00004_1
  contributor:
    fullname: Department of Defense.
– volume-title: Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response
  year: 1999
  ident: es051168tb00019/es051168tb00019_1
  contributor:
    fullname: Fields T.
– volume-title: Spatial Cluster Modeling
  year: 2002
  ident: es051168tb00021/es051168tb00021_1
  doi: 10.1201/9781420035414
  contributor:
    fullname: Lawson A. B.
– volume-title: International Association of Mathematical Geology Annual Meeting, Cancun, September 6−12
  year: 2001
  ident: es051168tb00024/es051168tb00024_1
  contributor:
    fullname: McKenna S. A.
SSID ssj0002308
Score 1.9240369
Snippet More than 40 000 km2 of former military land in the United States are contaminated with unexploded ordnance (UXO). Cleanup costs are estimated to total as much...
More than 40,000 km2 of former military land in the United States are contaminated with unexploded ordnance (UXO). Cleanup costs are estimated to total as much...
More than 40 000 km2 of former military land in the United States are contaminated with unexploded ordnance (UXO). Cleanup costs are estimated to total as much...
Using statistical modeling, sites contaminated with unexploded ordnance were explored. Experiments were conducted at two former military training ranges...
More than 40 000 km super(2) of former military land in the United States are contaminated with unexploded ordnance (UXO). Cleanup costs are estimated to total...
SourceID proquest
crossref
pubmed
pascalfrancis
istex
acs
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Publisher
StartPage 931
SubjectTerms Applied sciences
Bioremediation
Decontamination. Miscellaneous
Earth sciences
Earth, ocean, space
Engineering and environment geology. Geothermics
Environmental cleanup
Environmental Monitoring - methods
Environmental science
Exact sciences and technology
Explosions
Explosives
Military bases
Models, Statistical
Pollution
Pollution, environment geology
Refuse Disposal
Risk Assessment
Soil and sediments pollution
Statistical analysis
United States
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Warfare
Title Assessing Sites Contaminated with Unexploded Ordnance:  Statistical Modeling of Ordnance Spatial Distribution
URI http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es051168t
https://api.istex.fr/ark:/67375/TPS-R1NCTDH7-N/fulltext.pdf
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16509339
https://www.proquest.com/docview/230127763
https://search.proquest.com/docview/14762592
https://search.proquest.com/docview/20547510
Volume 40
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://sdu.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwjV07b9swED40ydIOfSRNqqZNiLboJtSiKJLqVtgOPDlB7ADZBIqPJYAcWDbQsWv_Zn9J7yRZToAY7SjoRBG8O95H8vgdwBeteKYHMsQpotUY47WNDUaRuMxEifDcSVvS1sBkpqa3ejQmmpzPO07wefLN12g3idSrPTjgChE44Z_hrJ9uEUPrTZmCPJW3G_qgh59S6LH1o9BzQKP4k1IhTY2jEdoyFrtxZhNvLl79V09fw8sOTrIfrf7fwDNfHcKLBySDh3A83t5lQ9HOmesjWLQHvijEZgg8a0ZMVYZSYxCFMtqgZTeVpxw9h8-XS0fcHP77n1-_GUHUhuEZG6RqanSnnS1CL8So0jFaNhsRL29XUust3FyM58NJ3NVfiI3I01UcjM7QfTNpvAjGBueUspmwWZBG-yBLqZzTNnM6F1L4EAZeGOG8TXKPatbpMexXi8q_A2YHuuTBOuG5F0np8tTkJa6dPA-4ZknyCM5QQUXnP3XRHI3zpOiHNIJPG90V9y0Px1NCXxut9hJmeUeJayor5lez4jqZDuejiSqm-LtHat82qXDGwxVoBKcbO9h2Ci0t4Qon5AjO-7fojXTEYiq_WGO_haIFJd8twREjK5wIIzhpzWv7byIzTNP8_b_G4hSetxtBlFTzAfZXy7X_CHu1W581rvEXIlwJLw
link.rule.ids 315,782,786,2770,27086,27934,27935,56749,56799
linkProvider American Chemical Society
linkToHtml http://sdu.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV1Lb9NAEB7R9gAceBQKptCuEOJmEdv7MrcqSRVECYikUm_Weh8XJAfFicSRK3-TX8KM7ditRIU4Wh6vV7MzO9_uzn4D8EarVOiRDHGGaDXGeG1jg1EkLgUvEZ47aUvaGpgt1PxKT6Y9TQ7dhcFO1NhS3RziD-wCyTtfo_kkUm_24EBIxcmCz8aLftZFKK131QryTF7tWISuf0oRyNY3ItABKfMHZUSaGpUS2moWt8PNJuycP_yfDj-CBx24ZGetNTyGO746hPvXKAcP4Wg63GxD0c616yewao9_UYgtEIbWjHirDCXKICZltF3LLitPGXsOnz-vHTF1-Pe_f_5iBFgbvmdskGqr0Q13tgq9EKO6x2jnbEIsvV2BradweT5djmdxV40hNjzPNnEwWqAzC2k8D8YG55SyglsRpNE-yFIq57QVTudcch_CyHPDnbdJ7nHQdXYE-9Wq8s-B2ZEu02Ad96nnSenyzOQlrqR8GnAFk-QRnKBGi86b6qI5KE-ToldpBK93Q1h8b1k5_ib0thncXsKsv1EamxLF8sui-JrMx8vJTBVz_N2N0R-aVDj_4Xo0guOdOQydQoNLUoXTcwSn_Vv0TTpwMZVfbbHfXNHyMr1dIkXErHBajOBZa2XDv4naMMvyF__SxSncnS0_XRQXH-Yfj-Feu0VE6TYvYX-z3vpXsFe77UnjLX8AOZsRnQ
linkToPdf http://sdu.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV1Lb9QwEB7RVkJw4FEohJbWQohb6CZxbIdbtQ8tAi0Vu5V6ixw_LkjZarMrceTav9lfwkxe20pUFccoE8caz3g-2-NvAD4qGadqIHyYIFoNMV6bUGMUCYuUFwjPrTAFbQ1M53J2qUZjosn53N2FwU5U2FJVH-KTV19Z3zIMRKeuQhOKhFrvwF4qZEZWfDac9zMvwmnVVSzIEnHZMQnd_pSikKnuRKE9UuhvyorUFSrGNxUt7oecdeiZPP_fTr-AZy3IZGeNVbyER67ch6e3qAf34WC8veGGoq2LV69g2RwDoxCbIxytGPFXaUqYQWzKaNuWXZSOMvcsPv9YWWLscF9u_lwzAq417zM2SDXW6KY7W_peiFH9Y7R3NiK23rbQ1mu4mIwXw2nYVmUINc-Sdei1StGpU6Ed99p4a6U0KTepF1o5LwohrVUmtSrjgjvvB45rbp2JMoeDr5ID2C2XpXsLzAxUEXtjuYsdjwqbJTorcEXlYo8rmSgL4Bi1mrdeVeX1gXkc5b1KA_jQDWN-1bBz_EvoUz3AvYRe_aJ0Npnmi_N5_jOaDRejqcxn-Ls7FrBtUuI8iOvSAA47k9h2Co0uiiVO0wGc9G_RR-ngRZduucF-c0nLzPh-iRiRs8TpMYA3jaVt_00Uh0mSvXtIFyfw-Hw0yb9_nX07hCfNThFl3RzB7nq1ce9hp7Kb49ph_gL_hxQg
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessing+Sites+Contaminated+with+Unexploded+Ordnance%3A+Statistical+Modeling+of+Ordnance+Spatial+Distribution&rft.jtitle=Environmental+science+%26+technology&rft.au=Macdonald%2C+Jacqueline+A&rft.au=Small%2C+Mitchell+J&rft.date=2006-02-01&rft.pub=American+Chemical+Society&rft.issn=0013-936X&rft.volume=40&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=931&rft_id=info:doi/10.1021%2Fes051168t&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT&rft.externalDocID=991449191
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0013-936X&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0013-936X&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0013-936X&client=summon