Modelling of Longwall Mining-Induced Strata Permeability Change

• Published in: Rock mechanics and rock engineering Vol. 48; no. 1; pp. 345 - 359
• Main Authors: Adhikary, D. P., Guo, H.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Vienna Springer Vienna 01-01-2015; Springer Nature B.V
• Subjects: Barriers; Boreholes; Civil Engineering; Coal; Coal mining; Earth and Environmental Science; Earth Sciences; Fracture mechanics; Geophysics/Geodesy; Mathematical models; Mining; Original Paper; Overburden; Packers; Permeability; Strata; Stress-strain curves; Underground construction; Packer testing; Cosserat continuum; Underground permeability measurement; Numerical modelling; Field monitoring; Mining-induced permeability
• ISSN: 0723-2632; 1434-453X
• DOI: 10.1007/s00603-014-0551-7

The field measurement of permeability within the strata affected by mining is a challenging and expensive task, thus such tests may not be carried out in large numbers to cover all the overburden strata and coal seams being affected by mining. However, numerical modelling in conjunction with a limited number of targeted field measurements can be used efficiently in assessing the impact of mining on a regional scale. This paper presents the results of underground packer testing undertaken at a mine site in New South Wales in Australia and numerical simulations conducted to assess the mining-induced strata permeability change. The underground packer test results indicated that the drivage of main headings (roadways) had induced a significant change in permeability into the solid coal barrier. Permeability increased by more than 50 times at a distance of 11.2–11.5 m from the roadway rib into the solid coal barrier. The tests conducted in the roof strata above the longwall goaf indicated more than 1,000-fold increase in permeability. The measured permeability values varied widely and strangely on a number of occasions; for example the test conducted from the main headings at the 8.2–8.5 m test section in the solid coal barrier showed a decline in permeability value as compared to that at the 11.2–11.5 m section contrary to the expectations. It is envisaged that a number of factors during the tests might have had affected the measured values of permeability: (a) swelling and smearing of the borehole, possibly lowering the permeability values; (b) packer bypass by larger fractures; (c) test section lying in small but intact (without fractures) rock segment, possibly resulting in lower permeability values; and (d) test section lying right at the extensive fractures, possibly measuring higher permeability values. Once the anomalous measurement data were discarded, the numerical model results could be seen to match the remaining field permeability measurement data reasonably well.