Feedpoint viscosity in geothermal wellbore simulation
[Display omitted] •We find a better way to average the viscosity at feeds in geothermal wellbore simulation.•The average viscosity corresponds to pseudopressure in gas flow in a reservoir.•Simulated geothermal well output curves show improved flow behaviour with this average.•We consider ways to app...
Saved in:
Published in: | Geothermics Vol. 50; pp. 24 - 29 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Oxford
Elsevier Ltd
01-04-2014
Elsevier |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | [Display omitted]
•We find a better way to average the viscosity at feeds in geothermal wellbore simulation.•The average viscosity corresponds to pseudopressure in gas flow in a reservoir.•Simulated geothermal well output curves show improved flow behaviour with this average.•We consider ways to approximate the integral that averages feed viscosity.
We consider the appropriate way to average reservoir and wellbore viscosities at a feedpoint, when simulating production in a geothermal well. Large differences in these values can arise when flashing occurs in a liquid-dominated reservoir, which may manifest as non-monotonic flowrates in simulated output curves. Integrating Darcy's law for flow to a feed from wellbore to reservoir gives an integral average for the reciprocal of viscosity as a function of pressure that is consistent with the productivity index formulation used in the geothermal wellbore simulators GWELL and SwelFlo. The average is related to the concept of pseudopressure, and various approximations to the integral average are considered, with the result that a trapezoidal rule provides a quick and accurate method. The critical shape of the dependence of average viscosity on wellbore and reservoir pressures is calculated, that separates monotonic from non-monotonic flowrate behaviour, and is found to plot as a straight line. The integral average also reveals that intuition is correct – flow to a feed is monotonic in the pressure there, despite possibly dramatic changes in viscosity. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0375-6505 1879-3576 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.geothermics.2013.07.007 |