Deciphering ApoE Genotype-Driven Proteomic and Lipidomic Alterations in Alzheimer’s Disease Across Distinct Brain Regions
Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is a neurodegenerative disease with a complex etiology influenced by confounding factors such as genetic polymorphisms, age, sex, and race. Traditionally, AD research has not prioritized these influences, resulting in dramatically skewed cohorts such as three times the numbe...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of proteome research Vol. 23; no. 8; pp. 2970 - 2985 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
United States
American Chemical Society
02-08-2024
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is a neurodegenerative disease with a complex etiology influenced by confounding factors such as genetic polymorphisms, age, sex, and race. Traditionally, AD research has not prioritized these influences, resulting in dramatically skewed cohorts such as three times the number of Apolipoprotein E (APOE) ε4-allele carriers in AD relative to healthy cohorts. Thus, the resulting molecular changes in AD have previously been complicated by the influence of apolipoprotein E disparities. To explore how apolipoprotein E polymorphism influences AD progression, 62 post-mortem patients consisting of 33 AD and 29 controls (Ctrl) were studied to balance the number of ε4-allele carriers and facilitate a molecular comparison of the apolipoprotein E genotype. Lipid and protein perturbations were assessed across AD diagnosed brains compared to Ctrl brains, ε4 allele carriers (APOE4+ for those carrying 1 or 2 ε4s and APOE4– for non-ε4 carriers), and differences in ε3ε3 and ε3ε4 Ctrl brains across two brain regions (frontal cortex (FCX) and cerebellum (CBM)). The region-specific influences of apolipoprotein E on AD mechanisms showcased mitochondrial dysfunction and cell proteostasis at the core of AD pathophysiology in the post-mortem brains, indicating these two processes may be influenced by genotypic differences and brain morphology. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 Human samples used in this paper were selected and sourced by C.A.M., C.L.M., J.D.D., and B.R. Proteomic and lipidomic samples were prepared by C.N. and analyzed by X.Z., J.E.K., M.M., K.B., K.E.B.-J., and E.S.B. K.G.S. and M.T.O. performed statistical analysis of resulting data. R.D.S., K.E.B.-J., B.R., and E.S.B. all conceptualized the paper, and M.T.O., K.E.B.-J., B.R., and E.S.B. wrote the paper. The final version of the paper was approved by all authors prior to submission. Author Contributions |
ISSN: | 1535-3893 1535-3907 1535-3907 |
DOI: | 10.1021/acs.jproteome.3c00604 |