Rating the ratings: Assessing the psychometric quality of rating data

Reviews research that is concerned with evaluating the psychometric qualities of data in the form of ratings (rating errors) and that has been plagued with conceptual and operational confusion and inconsistency. Following a brief historical survey, inconsistencies in definitions, quantifications, an...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Psychological bulletin Vol. 88; no. 2; pp. 413 - 428
Main Authors: Saal, Frank E, Downey, Ronald G, Lahey, Mary A
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Washington, etc American Psychological Association 01-09-1980
American Psychological Association, etc
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Reviews research that is concerned with evaluating the psychometric qualities of data in the form of ratings (rating errors) and that has been plagued with conceptual and operational confusion and inconsistency. Following a brief historical survey, inconsistencies in definitions, quantifications, and methodologies are documented in a review of more than 20 relevant articles published in Journal of Applied Psychology, Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, and Personnel Psychology (1975-1977). Empirical implications of these inconsistencies are discussed, and a revised typology of rating criteria, combined with a multivariate analytic approach, is suggested. (65 ref)
ISSN:0033-2909
1939-1455
DOI:10.1037/0033-2909.88.2.413