Subgroup Relations: A Comparison of Mutual Intergroup Differentiation and Common Ingroup Identity Models of Prejudice Reduction

• Published in: Personality & social psychology bulletin Vol. 26; no. 2; pp. 242 - 256
• Main Authors: Hornsey, Matthew J., Hogg, Michael A.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Thousand Oaks, CA SAGE Publications 01-02-2000; Sage Publications, Inc; SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC
• Subjects: Australia; Bias; College Students; Decision Making; Differentiation; Group dynamics; Group Identity; Intergroup Relations; Prejudice; Salience; Social psychology; Task Oriented Groups
• ISSN: 0146-1672; 1552-7433
• DOI: 10.1177/0146167200264010

Two studies examined relations between groups (humanities and math-science students) that implicitly or explicitly share a common superordinate category (university student). In Experiment 1, 178 participants performed a noninteractive decision-making task during which category salience was manipulated in a 2 (superordinate category salience)×2 (subordinate category salience) between-groups design. Consistent with the mutual intergroup differentiation model, participants for whom both categories were salient exhibited the lowest levels of bias, whereas bias was strongest when the superordinate category alone was made salient. This pattern of results was replicated in Experiment 2 (N = 135). In addition, Experiment 2 demonstrated that members of subgroups that are nested within a superordinate category are more sensitive to how the superordinate category is represented than are members of subgroups that extend beyond the boundaries of the superordinate category.