Structural Analysis of the α-2,3-Sialyltransferase Cst-I from Campylobacter jejuni in Apo and Substrate-Analogue Bound Forms
Sialic acid is an essential sugar in biology that plays key roles in numerous cellular processes and interactions. The biosynthesis of sialylated glycoconjugates is catalyzed by five distinct families of sialyltransferases. In the last 25 years, there has been much research on the enzymes themselves...
Saved in:
Published in: | Biochemistry (Easton) Vol. 46; no. 24; pp. 7196 - 7204 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
United States
American Chemical Society
19-06-2007
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Sialic acid is an essential sugar in biology that plays key roles in numerous cellular processes and interactions. The biosynthesis of sialylated glycoconjugates is catalyzed by five distinct families of sialyltransferases. In the last 25 years, there has been much research on the enzymes themselves, their genes, and their reaction products, but we still do not know the precise molecular mechanism of action for this class of glycosyltransferase. We previously reported the first detailed structural and kinetic characterization of Cst-II, a bifunctional sialyltransferase (CAZy GT-42) from the bacterium Campylobacter jejuni [Chiu et al. (2004) Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 11, 163−170]. This enzyme can use both Gal-β-1,3/4-R and Neu5Ac-α-2,3-Gal-β-1,3/4-R as acceptor sugars. A second sialyltransferase from this bacterium, Cst-I, has been shown to utilize solely Gal-β-1,3/4-R as the acceptor sugar in its transferase reaction. We report here the structural and kinetic characterization of this monofunctional enzyme, which belongs to the same sialyltransferase family as Cst-II, in both apo and substrate bound form. Our structural data show that Cst-I adopts a similar GTA-type glycosyltransferase fold to that of the bifunctional Cst-II, with conservation of several key noncharged catalytic residues. Significant differences are found, however, between the two enzymes in the lid domain region, which is critical to the creation of the acceptor sugar binding site. Furthermore, molecular modeling of various acceptor sugars within the active sites of these enzymes provides significant new insights into the structural basis for substrate specificities within this biologically important enzyme class. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | This work was funded by the Howard Hughes Medical Institute (to N.C.J.S.) and the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (to N.C.J.S., S.G.W., W.W.W.), Michael Smith Foundation for Health Research and Canada Foundation for Innovation infrastructure grant (to N.C.J.S.), the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council and a Human Frontiers Science Grant (to S.G.W.) and by the National Research Council of Canada (to W.W.W. and M.G.). Michael Smith Foundation for Health Research for Research Trainee scholarships to C.P.C.C. and L.L.L., and Canadian Institutes of Health Research for Doctoral Research Award to C.P.C.C. are acknowledged. Data collection was supported by the Advance Light Source, Berkeley, CA, USA. Coordinates for the structure described in this paper have been deposited in the Protein Data Bank with codes 2P2V and 2P56. istex:BE9C43F2F4075E423BF4CD269C583819F9E22FE2 ark:/67375/TPS-WF6H08WM-1 ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0006-2960 1520-4995 |
DOI: | 10.1021/bi602543d |