Paleomagnetic Constraints on the Rodinia Supercontinent: Implications for its Neoproterozoic Break-up and the Formation of Gondwana

• Published in: International geology review Vol. 40; no. 2; pp. 171 - 188
• Main Authors: D'agrella-Filho, Manoel S., Trindade, Ricardo I. F., Siqueira, Roberto, Ponte-Neto, Cosme F., Pacca, Igor I. G.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Taylor & Francis Group 01-02-1998
• ISSN: 0020-6814; 1938-2839
• DOI: 10.1080/00206819809465205

An interpretation of available paleomagnetic data from the Laurentia, Congo-Sao Francisco, Kalahari, and Amazonia cratons favors the hypothesis that these units were juxtaposed in a supercontinent by 1000 Ma. This supercontinent is similar to Hoffman's (1991) Rodinia, except for the Kalahari craton, whose 1300 to 1000 Ma Namaqua-Natal mobile belt is now juxtaposed against the correlated 1300 to 1000 Ma Grenville belt in eastern Laurentia, Our model suggests that a continuous 1300 to 1000 Ma orogenic belt, formed by the Grenville, Sunsas, Kibaride-Irumide-Lurio, Namaqua-Natal, and Dronning Maud Land-Coats Land belts, represents the suture zone between the Amazonia, Congo-Sao Francisco, Kalahari-Grunehogna, and Laurentia blocks.
The formation of western Gondwana (from our Rodinia supercontinent) may be accomplished by the closure of the large Mozambique Ocean and the more restricted Adamastor Ocean, combined with some counterclockwise rotation of the Congo-Sao Francisco craton. Rotation of the Congo-Sao Francisco craton can explain the observed oblique convergence and wrench tectonics of Pan African-Brasiliano mobile belts that encircle this craton. The model is also consistent with the synchroneity between the Rodinia break-up and the assembly of Gondwana, as suggested by several authors (Laurentia began to separate from Rodinia at ∼625 Ma or later).