The influence of limestone reefs on storm erosion and recovery of a perched beach

• Published in: Continental shelf research Vol. 47; pp. 16 - 27
• Main Authors: Gallop, Shari L., Bosserelle, Cyprien, Eliot, Ian, Pattiaratchi, Charitha B.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Elsevier Ltd 15-09-2012
• Subjects: Beach morphodynamics; Beaches; Coastal; Dunes; Geological framework; Hard-bottom beach; Lagoons; Limestone; Marine; Reefs; Rock; Rock platform; Storms; Western Australia; Yanchep Lagoon; Geological framework; Western Australia; Hard-bottom beach; Yanchep Lagoon; Beach morphodynamics; Rock platform
• ISSN: 0278-4343; 1873-6955
• DOI: 10.1016/j.csr.2012.08.001

Mechanisms through which naturally-occurring hard landforms, such as rock and coral reefs, influence coastal sediment transport are still poorly understood. Therefore, field investigations were undertaken during storm conditions on the sandy beaches of Yanchep Lagoon in southwestern Australia, which are perched on Quaternary limestone reefs. During two consecutive winter storms, the response of three subaerial beach profiles were quantified at: (a) an Exposed Profile which was fronted to seaward by a predominantly sandy substrate; (b) a Reef Profile that was fronted directly seaward by limestone outcrops submerged below mean sea level; and (c) a Bluff Profile where the dry beach was perched on a limestone bluff that reached above mean sea level and that contained a shallow coastal lagoon. The subaerial beach response to the storms had considerable spatial variation alongshore and was strongly dependent on the local rock topography. The Exposed Profile eroded most with a 2m-high scarp cut into the dune while the dunes at the Reef and Bluff Profiles were stable. The Bluff Profile also eroded considerably and the coastal lagoon widened and deepened. The Reef Profile was the most stable overall because erosion was balanced by short periods of accretion during the storm period which was partly due to sediment supplied by longshore transport through the coastal lagoon from the Bluff Profile. During the month after the storms wave energy was relatively low and the beach at the Exposed Profile accreted almost to the pre-storm volume, although the scarp in the dune was still present. The Reef Profile accreted most in the month after the storms while recovery at the Bluff Profile was low. It appeared that the bluff inhibited onshore sediment transport during and after the storms and in addition, strong currents in the lagoon transported sediment alongshore to supply the other beach profiles. These observations indicated that rock topography, especially elevation relative to sea level determined if beach erosion was reduced during storms and whether accretion was dampened in the post-storm recovery phase.
► The storm-response of a beach perched on natural limestone landforms was measured. ► Reefs and bluff reduced erosion while the exposed profile had severe erosion. ► The reef profile was the most stable. ► Post-storm, the exposed profile recovered the fastest. ► Post-storm, the bluff inhibited the recovery of the beach.