The Role of Psychological Flexibility in Recovery Following Mild Traumatic Brain Injury

• Published in: Rehabilitation psychology Vol. 66; no. 4; pp. 479 - 490
• Main Authors: Faulkner, Josh W., Snell, Deborah L., Theadom, Alice, Mahon, Susan, Barker-Collo, Suzanne
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States American Psychological Association 01-11-2021
• Subjects: Adult; Anxiety; Anxiety Disorders; Brain Concussion; Brain Injuries; Distress; Female; Functional Status; Human; Humans; Male; Outpatient; Post-Concussion Syndrome; Psychological Flexibility; Recovery (Disorders); Symptoms; Traumatic Brain Injury; Treatment Outcomes; psychological flexibility; postconcussion symptoms; outcomes; mild traumatic brain injury
• ISSN: 0090-5550; 1939-1544
• DOI: 10.1037/rep0000406

Purpose and Objective: Psychological distress is known to contribute to recovery following mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) and there is a need to understand the mechanisms that contribute to this relationship. The present study examined psychological flexibility, as a hypothesized psychological mechanism, in 169 treatment-seeking adults with mTBI. Research Method/Design: Participants completed self-report measures of postconcussion symptoms, psychological distress (anxiety, stress, and depression) and functional status within four weeks of entry to an mTBI outpatient clinic. A general measure (Acceptance and Action Questionnaire), as well as a context-specific (Acceptance and Action Questionnaire-Acquired Brain Injury) measure of psychological flexibility were administered. Results: Simple linear regression analysis showed that psychological flexibility made a significant contribution to the prediction of postconcussion symptoms and functional status. A series of multiple mediation analyses also found that psychological flexibility had a significant indirect effect on the relationships between psychological distress and postconcussion symptoms, and functional status. The context-specific, rather than the general measure of psychological flexibility, was consistently shown to contribute to these findings. Conclusions/Implications: These results suggest that psychological flexibility is a psychological mechanism that contributes to recovery outcomes in individuals with mTBI and could therefore be an important treatment target in mTBI interventions.
Impact and ImplicationsThere is a growing need to identify the psychological mechanisms that explain the relationship between psychological factors and mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) recovery outcomes; psychological flexibility may be one such mechanism. This study found that psychological flexibility significantly contributes to postconcussion symptoms and functional status in people after mTBI. Additionally, psychological flexibility partly mediated the relationship between psychological distress and postconcussion symptoms and functional status. The present study provides novel evidence that psychological flexibility may be an important psychological mechanism that contributes to recovery outcomes in individuals with mTBI. Psychological flexibility may be an important treatment target in mTBI interventions.