Small Impact Crater Populations on Saturn's Moon Tethys and Implications for Source Impactors in the System

• Published in: Journal of geophysical research. Planets Vol. 125; no. 9
• Main Authors: Ferguson, S. N., Rhoden, A. R., Kirchoff, M. R.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Washington Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01-09-2020
• Subjects: Computer simulation; Craters; Detritus; Diameters; Dione; Enceladus; Evolution; icy satellites; impact cratering; impactor populations; Impactors; Lunar surface; Mapping; Mimas; Moon; Moons; Orbital mechanics; Outer solar system; Parameter uncertainty; Pixels; Populations; Rhea (astronomy); Satellites; Saturn; Saturn satellites; Solar system; Terrain; Tethys
• DOI: 10.1029/2020JE006400
• EISSN: 2169-9100
• ISSN: 2169-9097

Current estimates place the ages of the inner Saturnian satellites (Mimas, Enceladus, Tethys, Dione, and Rhea) between 4.5 Gyr and 100 Myr. These estimates are based on impact crater measurements and dynamical simulations, both of which have uncertainties. Models of satellite evolution are inherently simplified and rely on uncertain or unknown parameters, which are often difficult to verify, whereas the interpretations of crater densities depend on the source populations of impactors, which are not well‐constrained in the outer solar system. We investigate the cratering history of Tethys, mapping the population of small impact craters, to determine the roles that planetocentric, heliocentric, or other impact debris play in its cratering record. To map the surface of Tethys, we chose five regions that were located in geographically distinct areas and had high‐resolution (~150 m/pix) image coverage by the Cassini ISS camera. We studied all craters that had at least 7 pixels across but mapped down to 5 pixels for completeness in the crater counts. We observe an abundance of small craters (D < 3 km) in the oldest region; this does not appear to be due to secondary cratering effects from the Odysseus impact basin. Fitting the production functions from Zahnle et al. (2003, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0019‐1035(03)00048‐4), we find that neither their Case A nor Case B scenarios align with the observed cratering record at Tethys. We conclude that in addition to the standard outer solar system impactor populations, there is a Saturn‐centric impactor source that is cratering Tethys.
Plain Language Summary
A major outstanding question post‐Cassini is the following: How old are the midsized moons of Saturn (Mimas, Enceladus, Tethys, Dione, and Rhea)? Recent models of their orbital evolution have suggested that they could be as young as 100 Myr. Characterizing the impactor flux and how it has changed with time may help constrain the histories of these moons. We have mapped small craters (diameter <10 km) on Tethys to examine the sources of objects that collide with the moon. We find that the older terrain unit has a surplus of small impact craters that is consistent with a source of Saturn‐orbiting debris. Younger terrain units appear to be more consistent with sun‐orbiting debris at small diameters. This scenario is compatible with both young and old moons but suggests an early source of planetocentric debris. Further study on other satellites in the system is needed to ascertain age relationships.
Key Points
We map small impact craters in high‐resolution (image resolution ~150 m/pix) images on Saturn's moon Tethys
We observe a surplus of small impact craters (1 km < D < 3 km) in the oldest region located near the Saturn facing side of the moon
We interpret the crater records to be representative of an additional source population of Saturn‐centric debris