Endurance of Deck-to-Deck Connections in Transverse Hardwood Glulam Decks
Dowel and stiffener beam deck-to-deck connections transfer shear and moment between hardwood glued-laminated (glulam) transverse deck panels in longitudinal timber bridges. The connections resist relative deflections between the deck panels and aid in the prevention of reflexive cracking of the bitu...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of bridge engineering Vol. 5; no. 1; pp. 84 - 89 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
American Society of Civil Engineers
01-02-2000
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Dowel and stiffener beam deck-to-deck connections transfer shear and moment between hardwood glued-laminated (glulam) transverse deck panels in longitudinal timber bridges. The connections resist relative deflections between the deck panels and aid in the prevention of reflexive cracking of the bituminous wearing surface at panel joints. Cyclic loading can reduce the stiffness of some types of deck-to-deck connections resulting in shortened service life. The performance of dowel and stiffener beam deck-to-deck connections for hardwood glulam transverse panel bridge decks was evaluated during cyclic laoding. Five tests were conducted with steel dowel connected deck panels, and five tests were conducted with glulam stiffener beam connected deck panels. Each connection was subjected to 1,000,000 load cycles. Degradation of connector stiffness with increasing number of load cycles was determined. Stiffener beam connections had better cyclic load response than the steel dowel connections. Steel dowel connections experienced approximately 20% degradation of stiffness after 1,000,000 load cycles. Most stiffener beam connections experienced little to no stiffness degradation after 1,000,000 load cycles; the smaller stiffener beam experienced 14% degradation after 1,000,000 load cycles. All connections remained within the limits of deflection criteria established in the 1994 AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 1084-0702 1943-5592 |
DOI: | 10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2000)5:1(84) |