The effectiveness of ambulatory continuous popliteal sciatic nerve blockade on patient-reported overall benefit of analgesia in patients undergoing foot or ankle surgery (CAREFREE trial); a randomized, open label, non-inferiority trial

Management of pain after foot and ankle surgery remains a concern for patients and healthcare professionals. This study determined the effectiveness of ambulatory continuous popliteal sciatic nerve blockade, compared to standard of care, on overall benefit of analgesia score (OBAS) in patients under...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of clinical anesthesia Vol. 95; p. 111451
Main Authors: Admiraal, Manouk, Smulders, Pascal S.H., Rutten, Martin V.H., de Groot, Eelko K., Heine, Yvonne, Baumann, Holger M., van der Vegt, Vincent H.C., Halm, Jens A., Hermanns, Henning, Schepers, Tim, Hollmann, Markus W., Hermanides, Jeroen, ten Hoope, Werner
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: United States Elsevier Inc 01-08-2024
Elsevier Limited
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Management of pain after foot and ankle surgery remains a concern for patients and healthcare professionals. This study determined the effectiveness of ambulatory continuous popliteal sciatic nerve blockade, compared to standard of care, on overall benefit of analgesia score (OBAS) in patients undergoing foot or ankle surgery. We hypothesized that usage of ambulatory continuous popliteal sciatic nerve blockade is non-inferior to standard of care. Single center, randomized, non-inferiority trial. Tertiary hospital in the Netherlands. Patients were enrolled if ≥18 years and scheduled for elective inpatient foot or ankle surgery. Patients were randomized to ambulatory continuous popliteal sciatic nerve blockade or standard of care. The primary outcome was the difference in OBAS, which includes pain, side effects of analgesics, and patient satisfaction, measured daily from the first to the third day after surgery. A non-inferiority margin of 2 was set as the upper limit for the 90% confidence interval of the difference in OBAS score. Mixed-effects modeling was employed to analyze differences in OBAS scores over time. Secondary outcome was the difference in opioid consumption. Patients were randomized to standard of care (n = 22), or ambulatory continuous popliteal sciatic nerve blockade (n = 22). Analyzing the first three postoperative days, the OBAS was significantly lower over time in the ambulatory continuous popliteal sciatic nerve blockade group compared to standard of care, demonstrating non-inferiority (−1.9 points, 90% CI -3.1 to −0.7). During the first five postoperative days, patients with ambulatory continuous popliteal sciatic nerve blockade consumed significantly fewer opioids over time compared to standard of care (−8.7 oral morphine milligram equivalents; 95% CI -16.1 to −1.4). Ambulatory continuous popliteal sciatic nerve blockade is non-inferior to standard of care with single shot popliteal sciatic nerve blockade on patient-reported overall benefit of analgesia. •Ambulatory nerve blocks are safe and feasible in foot and ankle surgery.•Ambulatory nerve blockade is non-inferior on overall benefit of analgesia.•Reduced opioid consumption makes this a promising option for foot or ankle surgery.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
ISSN:0952-8180
1873-4529
1873-4529
DOI:10.1016/j.jclinane.2024.111451