Towards successful physical stress reducing products: an evaluation of seven cases

Lifting, carrying, pushing and pulling at work are assumed to be related to increased risks of musculoskeletal injury, mainly in the low back and shoulder region. The implementation of products to reduce the physical load in heavy work is a well-known strategy to attack this problem. The success of...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Applied ergonomics Vol. 32; no. 5; pp. 525 - 534
Main Authors: de Looze, M.P., Urlings, I.J.M., Vink, P., van Rhijn, J.W., Miedema, M.C., Bronkhorst, R.E., van der Grinten, M.P.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Oxford Elsevier Ltd 01-10-2001
Elsevier
Elsevier Science Ltd
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Lifting, carrying, pushing and pulling at work are assumed to be related to increased risks of musculoskeletal injury, mainly in the low back and shoulder region. The implementation of products to reduce the physical load in heavy work is a well-known strategy to attack this problem. The success of these products depends not only on the product itself, but also on the process of product development and implementation. In this paper, seven cases are described where products have been developed to reduce the physical load on scaffolders, bricklayers, bricklayer's assistants, roofworkers, aircraft loaders, glaziers and assembly line workers. These products are described with special reference to the physical load problem in the occupational task, the process of product development, the nature of the product, the potential effects on physical load and the opinion of workers. From these cases, a list of key factors in product development contributing to the success of a product is composed. These concern among others a direct participation of workers, a wide analysis of risks, an analysis of potential negative side effects, and a systematic stepwise approach.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Case Study-3
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-Review-1
ObjectType-Feature-5
ObjectType-Report-2
ObjectType-Article-4
ISSN:0003-6870
1872-9126
DOI:10.1016/S0003-6870(01)00018-7