Improving the quality of care in nursing home organizations with urgent quality issues: design and effectiveness of a Dutch government-funded support programme

Various societal developments are currently challenging the ability of European nursing home organizations to meet quality standards. To support nursing home organizations throughout the Netherlands in quality improvement (QI), the Dutch government launched a nationwide programme in 2016 entitled &#...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:BMC health services research Vol. 23; no. 1; p. 507
Main Authors: Vermunt, Paulien, Reijmer, Yael, van Biessum, Clariska, de Groot, Valerie, van den Berg, Bellis, Nies, Henk
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: England BioMed Central Ltd 18-05-2023
BioMed Central
BMC
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Various societal developments are currently challenging the ability of European nursing home organizations to meet quality standards. To support nursing home organizations throughout the Netherlands in quality improvement (QI), the Dutch government launched a nationwide programme in 2016 entitled 'Dignity and pride' (D&p). As part of this programme, participating nursing home organizations followed a tailored trajectory centred around intensive, on-site support from external expert coaches. For this study, we evaluated to what extent quality improvements were realized in the programme, paying particular attention to the role of the expert coaches. Thirty-six nursing home organizations were included. At the start of D&p, the majority of these organizations (78%) had major quality issues as determined by the Health Care Inspectorate. Information on quality of care at the start versus end of the programme was obtained from improvement plans and final evaluation reports. Quality of person-centred care (PCC) and resident safety were quantified using a standardized assessment tool based on national guidelines, with improvements analysed using two-sided paired-sample T-tests. In addition, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 14 coaches and 29 healthcare professionals, focusing on the greatest benefits of programme participation and on the added value of the expert coaches. After completion of the programme, 60% of the organizations scored a 4 (= good) on PCC and resident safety, and none scored a 2 or less (average improvement on a 5-point scale for both themes: 1.9 points, p < 0.001). Interviewees confirmed that the quality of care had both improved and become more person-centred. The expert coaches were credited with substantially contributing to the QI process by offering an outsider's perspective, bringing in experience and expertise, and helping the organization stay committed and focused. Our study results suggest that the D&p programme was associated with improved quality of care in nursing home organizations with urgent quality issues. However, offering on-site tailored support through a nationally coordinated, government-funded programme is both time- and labour-intensive, and therefore not feasible in every healthcare setting. Nevertheless, the findings provide valuable insights for future QI support strategies.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1472-6963
1472-6963
DOI:10.1186/s12913-023-09538-w