Streptococcus agalactiae in pregnant women in Brazil: prevalence, serotypes, and antibiotic resistance
Brazilian data for maternal GBS colonization shows different prevalence rates. This conflicting data may be related to the absence of an official recommendation from the Federal Brazilian Health Authorities describing guidelines and protocols to perform GBS screening in pregnant women, in both publi...
Saved in:
Published in: | Brazilian journal of microbiology Vol. 50; no. 4; pp. 943 - 952 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Cham
Springer International Publishing
01-10-2019
Springer Nature B.V |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Brazilian data for maternal GBS colonization shows different prevalence rates. This conflicting data may be related to the absence of an official recommendation from the Federal Brazilian Health Authorities describing guidelines and protocols to perform GBS screening in pregnant women, in both public and private clinics. In the present review, we evaluated published reports addressing the prevalence of GBS in different regions of the country, methods used, and, when available, information regarding antibiotic resistance and serological typing of clinical isolates. According to this review, GBS prevalence in pregnant women in Brazil ranged from 4.2 to 28.4%, in the last 10 years. Serotype Ia was the most prevalent. The highest antibiotic resistance rates were found for tetarcycline, although its use to treat GBS infections is not common. Our results also show high resistance rates to clindamycin and erythromycin, which are commonly used as an alternative to penicillin in GBS infecctions. The increased antibiotic resistance, variations in serotype distribution, and high GBS prevalences need to be further investigated. Based on the present situation, recommendations regarding GBS surveillance in the country were raised and may improve our strategies for preventing neonatal infections. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 ObjectType-Review-3 content type line 23 Responsible Editor: Agnes Figueiredo |
ISSN: | 1517-8382 1678-4405 1678-4405 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s42770-019-00129-8 |