Business Plan Analysis Using Multi-Index Methodology: Expectations of Return and Perceived Risks

This article aims to show that business plan risks are clearer and more consistent, compared with classical methodology, when evaluated through the multi-index methodology. To do so, it is necessary to identify the expectations of return and perceived risks in evaluating a business plan. To explain...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Published in:	SAGE open Vol. 10; no. 1
Main Authors:	Souza, Alceu, de Oliveira, Ariane Maria Machado, Fossile, Dayla Karolina, Óguchi Ogu, Emmanuel, Dalazen, Luciano Luiz, da Veiga, Claudimar Pereira
Format:	Journal Article
Language:	English
Published:	Los Angeles, CA SAGE Publications 01-01-2020 SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC SAGE Publishing
Subjects:	Business plans investment decision-making cost management strategy multi-index methodology
Online Access:	Get full text
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

Description
Summary:	This article aims to show that business plan risks are clearer and more consistent, compared with classical methodology, when evaluated through the multi-index methodology. To do so, it is necessary to identify the expectations of return and perceived risks in evaluating a business plan. To explain the above statement, we used a case example of a manufacturing unit of purses made of tilapia leather in the city of Campo Mourão, Paraná State, Brazil. Relevant information was collected through documenting research and semi-structured interviews, which were conducted in 2016 and 2017. The adoption of the cost leadership strategy, practicable due to the presence of local production arrangements, proved crucial to this project’s viability. Following this strategy, the demand, initial investments, production costs, and selling price were estimated. The multi-index methodology was used for the generation and analysis of the return indicators vis-à-vis the perceived risks. The multi-index methodology perceptual map signals a medium/high return (return on investment assets = 23.71% per year) and that the perceived risks are compatible with profit expectations. The sensitivity analysis of the results, using the Monte Carlo method, shows that P(net present value ≤ 0) ≈ 0.0002, thus corroborating the decision to invest in this business. This article contributes to the literature on the use of existing productive arrangements in various stages of the production and marketing process and the use of an analysis methodology that leads decision-makers to specify the risks associated with their decision.
ISSN:	2158-2440 2158-2440
DOI:	10.1177/2158244019900171