A review on robust M-estimators for regression analysis

•Facilitating the exchange of knowledge between the areas of statistics, geodesy, meteorology, engineering, economics, image processing, astronomy, etc...•These estimators can adapt their shape by varying some parameters so that the estimator obtains characteristics of monotonous, soft-redescending...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Computers & chemical engineering Vol. 147; p. 107254
Main Authors: de Menezes, D.Q.F., Prata, D.M., Secchi, A.R., Pinto, J.C.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier Ltd 01-04-2021
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:•Facilitating the exchange of knowledge between the areas of statistics, geodesy, meteorology, engineering, economics, image processing, astronomy, etc...•These estimators can adapt their shape by varying some parameters so that the estimator obtains characteristics of monotonous, soft-redescending or hardredescending estimators.•For many robust estimators, specifically, those classified as redescending, there is a need for global-type optimization methods, since their structure are non-convex.•Tuning constants of all these estimators, for 90%, 95%, 98%, and 99% relative efficiency levels regarding the Normal distribution. Regression analysis constitutes an important tool for investigating the effect of explanatory variables on response variables. When outliers and bias errors are present, the weighted least squares estimator can perform poorly. For this reason, alternative robust techniques have been studied in several areas of science. However, often these different scientific communities are disconnected from each other, culminating in the scarcity of knowledge exchange among these areas. Thus, this paper presents a review on robust M-estimators in various knowledge areas. 50 (48 robust) M-estimators are illustrated, including the Weighted Least Squares estimator (non-robust), the Contaminated Normal estimator (quasi-robust), the Huber estimator (monotone), the Correntropy estimator (soft-redescending), the Smith estimator (hard-redescending), and the adaptive Barron and Generalized T-distribution. The mathematical functions that describe the estimators and their respective graphical forms are presented. The tuning constants of all these estimators, for 90%, 95%, 98%, and 99% relative efficiency levels in respect to the Normal distribution are also presented.
ISSN:0098-1354
1873-4375
DOI:10.1016/j.compchemeng.2021.107254