Surface morphological and physical characterizations of glass ionomer cements after sterilization processes

Surface morphological and physical characterizations of glass ionomer cements after sterilization processes

The aim of this study was to investigate if sterilization methods would promote changes in the selected adhesion‐related surface properties of glass ionomer cements (GICs). Riva self‐cure (RSC) and Riva light‐cure (RLC) GICs were tested. Thirty samples were prepared according to the type of material...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Microscopy research and technique Vol. 81; no. 10; pp. 1208 - 1213
Main Authors: de Sousa‐Lima, Rodolfo X., de Lima, Joyce F. M., Silva de Azevedo, Lucas J., de Freitas Chaves, Letícia V., Alonso, Roberta C. B., Borges, Boniek C. D.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Hoboken, USA John Wiley & Sons, Inc 01-10-2018
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Subjects:
Adhesion
Contact angle
Data processing
Gas plasmas
Glass ionomer cements
Hydrogen peroxide
Ionomers
Materials selection
peroxide plasm sterilization
Polytetrafluoroethylene
Scanning electron microscopy
Statistical analysis
Statistical methods
Steam
steam sterilization
Sterilization
surface changes
Surface properties
Surface roughness
Variance analysis
Wettability
peroxide plasm sterilization
surface changes
steam sterilization
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The aim of this study was to investigate if sterilization methods would promote changes in the selected adhesion‐related surface properties of glass ionomer cements (GICs). Riva self‐cure (RSC) and Riva light‐cure (RLC) GICs were tested. Thirty samples were prepared according to the type of material (RSC and RLC) and sterilization method: hydrogen peroxide gas plasma (HPGP), steam sterilization (SS), and no sterilization (n = 5 per group). A Teflon matrix (5 × 2 mm) was filled with one of the GICs to produce the samples. For the groups with the RLC material, the samples were light cured using a light curing unit for 20 s. After 24 hr, finishing and polishing were performed in all samples and then they were sterilized. Surface roughness, wettability, and micromorphology were accessed using a profilometer, a goniometer, and a scanning electron microscopy, respectively. Data were statistically analyzed through a two‐way ANOVA and Tukey post‐hoc test (p < .05). Both sterilization methods promoted similar roughness values to the nonsterilized samples (p > .05). HPGP decreased contact angle for RSC (p < .01), and SS increased contact angle for RLC (p < .01). Samples subjected to HPGP presented similar surface micromorphology to nonsterilized ones, regardless of the material. SS promoted exposition of smaller filler particles in both materials. Although sterilization methods did not alter surface roughness and wettability, the sterilization methods selectively altered the micromorphology of the materials tested. Research highlights This study's main finding suggests that each sterilization method altered the surface of glass ionomers in different ways. Thus, the choice of sterilization methods prior to bacterial adhesion can lead to a bias in antimicrobial studies.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1059-910X
1097-0029
DOI:10.1002/jemt.23119