CERVICAL INTRAEPITHELIAL NEOPLASIA (CIN). COMPARISON OF HISTOLOGICAL AND PAP RESULTS
ABSTRACT Objectives: The aim of this study is to investigate the compatibility of pathohistological and Pap findings on material obtained by cervical biopsy and excoalation, and to investigate the compatibility of qualitative histological pattern and diagnosis Material and Methods: The study include...
Saved in:
Published in: | Acta medica Saliniana Vol. 53; no. 2; pp. 11 - 16 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Tuzla
University Clinical Center Tuzla
01-07-2023
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | ABSTRACT Objectives: The aim of this study is to investigate the compatibility of pathohistological and Pap findings on material obtained by cervical biopsy and excoalation, and to investigate the compatibility of qualitative histological pattern and diagnosis Material and Methods: The study included L52 patients with premalignant lesions of the cervix who underwent Pap testing and targeted cervical biopsy. There was no statistically significant difference in the diagnosis made on the basis of the Pap test and pathohistologic analysis depending on the quality of the material Conclusion: There was a strong positive correlation between the grade established by cytology (Pap test) and the pathohistological diagnosis (PHD). There was no statistically significant difference in the age of the subjects depending on the grade determined by the analysis of the sample obtained by the PAP -test (Kruskal-Wallis test, p = o.u6) or PH -analysis (Kruskal-Wallis test, p = 0065). DISCUSSION This study examined data from patients with preinvasive cervical changes over a one-year period, from January 1, 2012, to December 31, 2012. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0350-364X 1840-3956 |
DOI: | 10.5457/666 |