Smartphone-sensor-based human activities classification for forensics: a machine learning approach
The accurate classification of human activities in crime scenes during forensics (criminalistics) is of utmost importance in classifying suspicious and unlawful activities, easing their acceptability and interpretability by judges during legal procedures in courts or by other non-experts in the fiel...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of Electrical Systems and Information Technology Vol. 11; no. 1; pp. 33 - 16 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Berlin/Heidelberg
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
01-12-2024
Springer Nature B.V SpringerOpen |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | The accurate classification of human activities in crime scenes during forensics (criminalistics) is of utmost importance in classifying suspicious and unlawful activities, easing their acceptability and interpretability by judges during legal procedures in courts or by other non-experts in the field of forensics. This paper implements machine learning (ML) algorithms: support vector machine (SVM) and decision tree (DT), to demonstrate with a high accuracy, how data emanating from smartphones’ sensors reveal and isolate relevant information about static and dynamic human activities in criminalistics. Smartphones’ data from five different sensors (accelerometer, gravity, orientation, Gyroscope and light), related to ten recurrent crime scenes activities, grouped into three classes of events (normal, felony and none-felony events) are classified by the proposed algorithms, with novelty being the classification decisions based on the entire period of the events and not instantaneous decision makings. Three independent data-subsets were made, with permutations done between them and at each time, two sets used for training and the third set used for testing. Time- and frequency-domain features were initially used separately and then combined for the model training and testing. The best average training accuracies of 100% and 97.8% were obtained for the DT and SVM, respectively, and the testing accuracies of 89.1% were obtained for both algorithms. We therefore believe that these results will serve as a solid persuasive and convincing argument to judges and non-experts of the field of forensics to accept and easily interpret computer-aided classification of suspicious activities emanating from criminalistic studies. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2314-7172 |
DOI: | 10.1186/s43067-024-00157-x |