Non-Mass Enhancements on DCE-MRI: Development and Validation of a Radiomics-Based Signature for Breast Cancer Diagnoses

We aimed to assess the additional value of a radiomics-based signature for distinguishing between benign and malignant non-mass enhancement lesions (NMEs) on dynamic contrast-enhanced breast magnetic resonance imaging (breast DCE-MRI). In this retrospective study, 232 patients with 247 histopatholog...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Frontiers in oncology Vol. 11; p. 738330
Main Authors: Li, Yan, Yang, Zhenlu L, Lv, Wenzhi Z, Qin, Yanjin J, Tang, Caili L, Yan, Xu, Guo, Yihao H, Xia, Liming M, Ai, Tao
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Switzerland Frontiers Media S.A 22-09-2021
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:We aimed to assess the additional value of a radiomics-based signature for distinguishing between benign and malignant non-mass enhancement lesions (NMEs) on dynamic contrast-enhanced breast magnetic resonance imaging (breast DCE-MRI). In this retrospective study, 232 patients with 247 histopathologically confirmed NMEs (malignant: 191; benign: 56) were enrolled from December 2017 to October 2020 as a primary cohort to develop the discriminative models. Radiomic features were extracted from one post-contrast phase (around 90s after contrast injection) of breast DCE-MRI images. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression model was adapted to select features and construct the radiomics-based signature. Based on clinical and routine MR features, radiomics features, and combined information, three discriminative models were built using multivariable logistic regression analyses. In addition, an independent cohort of 72 patients with 72 NMEs (malignant: 50; benign: 22) was collected from November 2020 to April 2021 for the validation of the three discriminative models. Finally, the combined model was assessed using nomogram and decision curve analyses. The routine MR model with two selected features of the time-intensity curve (TIC) type and MR-reported axillary lymph node (ALN) status showed a high sensitivity of 0.942 (95%CI, 0.906 - 0.974) and low specificity of 0.589 (95%CI, 0.464 - 0.714). The radiomics model with six selected features was significantly correlated with malignancy (P<0.001 for both primary and validation cohorts). Finally, the individual combined model, which contained factors including TIC types and radiomics signatures, showed good discrimination, with an acceptable sensitivity of 0.869 (95%CI, 0.816 to 0.916), improved specificity of 0.839 (95%CI, 0.750 to 0.929). The nomogram was applied to the validation cohort, reaching good discrimination, with a sensitivity of 0.820 (95%CI, 0.700 to 0.920), specificity of 0.864 (95%CI,0.682 to 1.000). The combined model was clinically helpful, as demonstrated by decision curve analysis. Our study added radiomics signatures into a conventional clinical model and developed a radiomics nomogram including radiomics signatures and TIC types. This radiomics model could be used to differentiate benign from malignant NMEs in patients with suspicious lesions on breast MRI.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
This article was submitted to Breast Cancer, a section of the journal Frontiers in Oncology
Edited by: Nicola Fusco, University of Milan, Italy
Reviewed by: Elham Sajjadi, University of Milan, Italy; Umberto Malapelle, University of Naples Federico II, Italy
ISSN:2234-943X
2234-943X
DOI:10.3389/fonc.2021.738330