The efficacy and safety of remimazolam tosylate versus propofol in patients undergoing colonoscopy: a multicentered, randomized, positive-controlled, phase III clinical trial
This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of remimazolam tosylate versus propofol in patients undergoing colonoscopy. In this multicentered, blinded, randomized, active-controlled, non-inferior phase III trial, 384 eligible patients who were about to undergo colonoscopy were randomized as...
Saved in:
Published in: | American journal of translational research Vol. 12; no. 8; pp. 4594 - 4603 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
e-Century Publishing Corporation
01-01-2020
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of remimazolam tosylate versus propofol in patients undergoing colonoscopy. In this multicentered, blinded, randomized, active-controlled, non-inferior phase III trial, 384 eligible patients who were about to undergo colonoscopy were randomized as a ratio of 1:1 into remimazolam and propofol group. Procedure success was assessed and defined as the completion of colonoscopy without administration of rescue sedative agent or more than 5 top-ups of trial drug in any 15 minute-period after initial administration of trial drug. Sedation quality was evaluated by Modified Observer’s Assessment of Alertness/Sedation score. Treatment-emergent adverse events were recorded. Procedure success rate was 96.91% (188/194) in remimazolam group and 100% (190/190) in propofol group, and the difference in rate was -3.09% with 95% confidence interval (CI) of -5.53%~-0.66%. Since the lower limit of 95% CI was greater than the non-inferiority margin of -8.00%, the efficacy of remimazolam tosylate was non-inferior to propofol. Besides, induction time of sedation was increased (
P
<0.001), while hypotension and respiratory depression was decreased in remimazolam group compared to propofol group; however, time to fully alert (
P
>0.05) or time to discharge (
P
>0.05) were unchanged. For safety assessment, total treatment-emergent adverse events were decreased in remimazolam group compared to propofol group (
P
<0.001); specifically, administration site pain (
P
<0.001), increased bilirubin (
P
=0.019), decreased respiratory rate (
P
<0.001) and decreased SpO
2
(
P
<0.001) were less frequent in remimazolam group compared with propofol group. In conclusion, remimazolam tosylate is non-inferior in sedation efficacy while safer than propofol in patients undergoing colonoscopy. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 1943-8141 1943-8141 |