Spatial Heterogeneity, Not Visitation Bias, Dominates Variation in Herbivory

Experiments in ecology can have unintended side effects. Recently, it has been suggested that the act of visiting a plant, inherent to studying herbivory, may alter plant performance and interactions. To evaluate the generality of this inference, we examined plant performance and herbivory on 14 pla...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Ecology (Durham) Vol. 84; no. 8; pp. 2214 - 2221
Main Authors: Bradley, Kate L., Damschen, Ellen I., Young, Lauren M., Kuefler, Daniel, Went, Sarah, Wray, Galen, Haddad, Nick M., Johannes M. H. Knops, Louda, Svata M.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Washington, DC Ecology Society of America 01-08-2003
Ecological Society of America
Ecological Society of America (ESA)
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Experiments in ecology can have unintended side effects. Recently, it has been suggested that the act of visiting a plant, inherent to studying herbivory, may alter plant performance and interactions. To evaluate the generality of this inference, we examined plant performance and herbivory on 14 plant species in three geographic regions. Visitation did not significantly affect any of the variables that we measured, including leaf damage, height, biomass, or survivorship, for any species. However, rates of herbivory varied significantly among sites and regions. Thus, our data do not support the generality of visitation impacting estimates of herbivory. We propose that future studies of herbivory will gain more by evaluating spatial heterogeneity in interaction outcomes than by quantifying possible experimenter-caused variation.
Bibliography:E‐mail
kbradle1@bigred.unl.edu
Corresponding Editor: S. Lavorel
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
USDOE Office of Environmental Management (EM)
AI09-00SR22188
na
ISSN:0012-9658
1939-9170
DOI:10.1890/02-3082