Comparison of on-line and off-line methods to quantify reactive oxygen species (ROS) in atmospheric aerosols

Atmospheric aerosol particle concentrations have been linked with a wide range of pulmonary and cardio-vascular diseases but the particle properties responsible for these negative health effects are largely unknown. It is often speculated that reactive oxygen species (ROS) present in atmospheric par...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Atmospheric environment (1994) Vol. 92; pp. 97 - 103
Main Authors: Fuller, S.J., Wragg, F.P.H., Nutter, J., Kalberer, M.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Kidlington Elsevier Ltd 01-08-2014
Elsevier
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Atmospheric aerosol particle concentrations have been linked with a wide range of pulmonary and cardio-vascular diseases but the particle properties responsible for these negative health effects are largely unknown. It is often speculated that reactive oxygen species (ROS) present in atmospheric particles lead to oxidative stress in, and ultimately disease of, the human lung. The quantification of ROS is highly challenging because some ROS components such as radicals are highly reactive and therefore short-lived. Thus, fast analysis methods are likely advantageous over methods with a long delay between aerosol sampling and ROS analysis. We present for the first time a detailed comparison of conventional off-line and fast on-line methods to quantify ROS in organic aerosols. For this comparison a new and fast on-line instrument was built and characterized to quantify ROS in aerosol particles with high sensitivity and a limit of detection of 4 nmol H2O2 equivalents per m3 air. ROS concentrations are measured with a time resolution of approximately 15 min, which allows the tracking of fast changing atmospheric conditions. The comparison of the off-line and on-line method shows that, in oxidized organic model aerosol particles, the majority of ROS have a very short lifetime of a few minutes whereas a small fraction is stable for a day or longer. This indicates that off-line techniques, where there is often a delay of hours to days between particle collection and ROS analysis, may severely underestimate true ROS concentrations and that fast on-line techniques are necessary for a reliable ROS quantification in atmospheric aerosol particles and a meaningful correlation with health outcomes. •Design and characterisation of fast on-line ROS instrument using DCFH assay.•Comparison of new on-line instrument with off-line filter extraction.•Ca. 80% of ROS is very short-lived with a lifetime of a few min in organic aerosol.•Fast on-line methods are needed to quantify ROS in atmospheric aerosols reliably.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1352-2310
1873-2844
DOI:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.04.006