A novel method to standardise serum IgA measurements shows an increased prevalence of IgA deficiency in young children with recurrent respiratory tract infections

Objectives While physicians are often confronted with immunoglobulin A (IgA) deficiency in children with recurrent infections, the clinical relevance of this finding is unclear. Large‐scale studies examining the significance of IgA deficiency in children are hampered by differences in techniques for...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Clinical & translational immunology Vol. 10; no. 11; pp. e1344 - n/a
Main Authors: Koenen, Mischa H, Bosma, Madeleen, Roorda, Udo A, Wopereis, Fabiënne MY, Roos, Anja, der Vries, Erhard, Bogaert, Debby, Sanders, Elisabeth AM, Boes, Marianne, Heidema, Jojanneke, Montfrans, Joris M, Balemans, Walter AF, Holten, Thijs C, Verhagen, Lilly M
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Australia John Wiley & Sons, Inc 2021
John Wiley and Sons Inc
Wiley
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Objectives While physicians are often confronted with immunoglobulin A (IgA) deficiency in children with recurrent infections, the clinical relevance of this finding is unclear. Large‐scale studies examining the significance of IgA deficiency in children are hampered by differences in techniques for measuring IgA and the physiological increase of IgA with age. Both result in a variety of reference values used for diagnosing IgA deficiency. We propose a new laboratory‐independent method to accurately compare IgA measurements in children of varying ages. Methods We present a method to standardise IgA values for age and laboratory differences. We applied this method to a multicentre case–control study of children under the age of seven suffering from recurrent respiratory tract infections (rRTI, cases) and children who had IgA measured as part of coeliac disease screening (controls). We defined IgA deficiency as serum IgA measurements < 2.5% for age‐specific reference values. Results We developed reference values for IgA for seven age groups and five different laboratory assays. Using these reference values, IgA measurements from 417 cases and 224 controls were standardised to compare groups. In children aged 2 years and older, IgA deficiency was observed in 2.9% (7/242) of cases and 0% (0/189) of controls (P = 0.02). Conclusion We present a method to compare IgA values in cohorts that vary in age and laboratory assay. This way, we showed that IgA deficiency was more prevalent in children with rRTI compared with controls. This implicates that IgA deficiency may be a clinically relevant condition, even in young children. With our method to standardize IgA values for laboratory and age differences, we show that IgA deficiency is more prevalent in children less than 7 years of age with recurrent respiratory infections compared with controls, implicating the clinical relevance.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:2050-0068
2050-0068
DOI:10.1002/cti2.1344