Search Results - "Wharton, Jeanne A."

  • Showing 1 - 5 results of 5
Refine Results
  1. 1

    The Influence of Hearing Aid Cost on Perceived Benefit in Older Adults by Newman, Craig W, Hug, Gerald A, Wharton, Jeanne A, Jacobson, Gary P

    Published in Ear and hearing (01-08-1993)
    “…ABSTRACTSelf-report hearing handicap scales are gaining widespread acceptance among clinicians as a technique for quantifying hearing aid benefit. Both…”
    Get full text
    Journal Article
  2. 2

    Relationships among psychoacoustic judgments, speech understanding ability and self-perceived handicap in tinnitus subjects by Newman, C W, Wharton, J A, Shivapuja, B G, Jacobson, G P

    Published in Audiology (01-01-1994)
    “…Tinnitus is often a disturbing symptom which affects 6-20% of the population. Relationships among tinnitus pitch and loudness judgments, audiometric speech…”
    Get more information
    Journal Article
  3. 3

    Electrophysiological indices of selective auditory attention in subjects with and without tinnitus by Jacobson, Gary P., Calder, Jaynee A., Newman, Craig W., Peterson, Edward L., Wharton, Jeanne A., Ahmad, B.K.

    Published in Hearing research (01-08-1996)
    “…The present investigation was conducted in an attempt to determine whether selective auditory attention abilities differed between normal subjects and subjects…”
    Get full text
    Journal Article
  4. 4

    Retest stability of the tinnitus handicap questionnaire by Newman, C W, Wharton, J A, Jacobson, G P

    Published in Annals of otology, rhinology & laryngology (01-09-1995)
    “…The test-retest stability of the Tinnitus Handicap Questionnaire was assessed for a sample of 32 tinnitus patients. The questionnaire is a self-report measure…”
    Get more information
    Journal Article
  5. 5

    Influence of menopause on the auditory brainstem response by Wharton, J A, Church, G T

    Published in Audiology (1990)
    “…Auditory brainstem response (ABR) wave latency, interpeak interval and amplitude as a function of intensity were measured in 40 subjects divided into equal…”
    Get more information
    Journal Article