Diagnostic criteria and reporting procedures for pre-eclampsia: A national survey among obstetrical departments in Denmark

A precondition for the rational use of obstetric databases in biomedical research is detailed knowledge on how data are being generated. We identified the diagnostic procedures and criteria for pre-eclampsia (PE) and assessed the level of obstetric training of the personnel responsible for the recor...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Published in:	European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology Vol. 123; no. 1; pp. 41 - 45
Main Authors:	Klemmensen, Åse K., Olsen, Sjurdur F., Wengel, Christina M., Tabor, Ann
Format:	Journal Article
Language:	English
Published:	Shannon Elsevier Ireland Ltd 01-11-2005 Elsevier
Subjects:	Biological and medical sciences Blood Pressure Denmark - epidemiology Diseases of mother, fetus and pregnancy Education, Medical Female Gynecology - education Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics Humans Hypertension in pregnancy Medical sciences Obstetrics - education Pre-eclampsia Pre-Eclampsia - diagnosis Pre-Eclampsia - epidemiology Pre-eclampsia criteria Pre-eclampsia definition Pregnancy Pregnancy. Fetus. Placenta Registries Surveys and Questionnaires Denmark Europe Pre-eclampsia Pre-eclampsia criteria Hypertension in pregnancy Pre-eclampsia definition Hypertension Pregnancy disorders Gynecology Definition Cardiovascular disease Obstetrics Pregnancy toxemia Preeclampsia Female Diagnosis Public health
Online Access:	Get full text
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

Description
Summary:	A precondition for the rational use of obstetric databases in biomedical research is detailed knowledge on how data are being generated. We identified the diagnostic procedures and criteria for pre-eclampsia (PE) and assessed the level of obstetric training of the personnel responsible for the records submitted to the patient registry at the Danish National Board of Health. A structured questionnaire, including three case stories, was sent to the chief consultant of the department. Thirty-three out of the 34 Danish departments (97%) returned the questionnaire. Reporters of pregnancy diagnoses to the National Patient Registry differed widely in training. For complicated pregnancies, departments ranged from having only specialists reporting all cases to secretaries reporting up to 50%. Cut off limits of blood pressure (BP) and protein loss used to diagnose pre-eclampsia showed large differences across departments. The diagnoses given to three case stories showed little correlation to the criteria the departments reported using. Even in a small country like Denmark with 34 obstetrical departments, there was little consensus on the diagnostic criteria for pre-eclampsia. The findings emphasize the need for standardizing diagnostic criteria and reporting practice and may have implications on how to interpret data regarding pre-eclampsia.
Bibliography:	ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23
ISSN:	0301-2115 1872-7654
DOI:	10.1016/j.ejogrb.2005.02.020