Iron addition as a measure to restore water quality: Implications for macrophyte growth

•Effects of iron addition (20 and 40gFem−2) on two different macrophyte species.•Elodea nuttallii growth was not affected and Potamogeton pectinatus growth decreased.•Biomass of both species increased in all treatments relative to starting conditions.•Difference in reaction of macrophytes to iron ma...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Aquatic botany Vol. 116; pp. 44 - 52
Main Authors: Immers, A.K., Vendrig, K., Ibelings, B.W., Van Donk, E., Ter Heerdt, G.N.J., Geurts, J.J.M., Bakker, E.S.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Amsterdam Elsevier B.V 01-05-2014
Elsevier
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:•Effects of iron addition (20 and 40gFem−2) on two different macrophyte species.•Elodea nuttallii growth was not affected and Potamogeton pectinatus growth decreased.•Biomass of both species increased in all treatments relative to starting conditions.•Difference in reaction of macrophytes to iron may affect macrophyte community composition.•Species of high conservation value still sprouted from sediment with iron addition. Eutrophication of shallow lakes in North-West Europe has resulted in cyanobacterial blooms, turbid water, and a decline in submerged macrophytes. Even though external inputs of phosphorus (P) are declining, internal loading of P from the sediment may delay the recovery of these aquatic ecosystems. Iron can be a useful chemical binding agent to combat internal P loading in shallow lakes, but may potentially be harmful for macrophyte growth. We tested whether iron addition as a restoration measure harms the growth of submerged macrophytes. We hypothesized that this depends on the iron dosage and the rooting strategy of the macrophytes. We experimentally tested the effects of Fe (FeCl3) on the submerged macrophytes Potamogeton pectinatus L. and Elodea nuttallii (Planch.) H. St. John. Iron was dosed at a concentration of 20gFem−2 and 40gFem−2 to the surface water or to both the surface water and sediment. E. nuttallii growth was not affected by iron addition, whereas P. pectinatus growth significantly decreased with increasing iron concentrations. Nonetheless, biomass of both species increased in all treatments relative to starting conditions. During the experiment, propagules sprouted from a propagule bank in the sediment including species with a high conservation value and this spontaneous emergence was not influenced by increasing iron concentrations. We conclude that adding iron(III)chloride in dosages of 20–40gm−2 may reduce growth of some macrophyte species, but does not prevent overall macrophyte recovery. It may however affect macrophyte community composition due to differential responses of macrophyte species to iron addition.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0304-3770
1879-1522
DOI:10.1016/j.aquabot.2014.01.007