Communities and tree seedling distribution in Quercus rubra- and Prunus serotina-dominated forests in southwestern Pennsylvania

We characterized forest communities and tree seedling distribution in Forbes State Forest in order to elucidate tree regeneration problems in stands that had been either undisturbed, selectively cut or clear-cut in the 20th century. Undisturbed and selectively cut stands were classified into three Q...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The American midland naturalist Vol. 126; no. 2; pp. 294 - 307
Main Authors: Smith, L.L. (Miami University, Oxford, OH), Vankatk, J.L
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Notre Dame University of Notre Dame 01-10-1991
American Midland Naturalist
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:We characterized forest communities and tree seedling distribution in Forbes State Forest in order to elucidate tree regeneration problems in stands that had been either undisturbed, selectively cut or clear-cut in the 20th century. Undisturbed and selectively cut stands were classified into three Quercus rubra- and two Prunus serotina-dominated community types. Three of these five types were products of logging in the two primary forest types: QUERCUS RUBRA-MIXED HARDWOOD and PRUNUS SEROTINA-ACER SACCHARUM-FAGUS GRANDIFOLIA forests. Ordination and regression analysis indicated that the division between the Q. rubra- and the P. serotina-dominated communities was associated with differences in slope inclination, soil chemistry and soil texture. Clear-cut stands were divided into four community types, all of which were successional stages of P. serotina-dominated forests. The distribution of tree seedlings was related to overstory vegetation gradients, soil chemistry and species of overtopping tree. Cover of Q. rubra seedlings was negatively related to cover of the fern, Dennstaedtia punctilobula, a species previously implicated in tree regeneration problems. Dennstaedtia cover was negatively related to canopy cover, indicating that it increases following logging.
Bibliography:9150298
P33
F40
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:0003-0031
1938-4238
DOI:10.2307/2426105