Population Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Paclitaxel and Carboplatin in Ovarian Cancer Patients: A Study by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer-Pharmacology and Molecular Mechanisms Group and New Drug Development Group
Purpose: Paclitaxel and carboplatin are frequently used in advanced ovarian cancer following cytoreductive surgery. Threshold models have been used to predict paclitaxel pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamics, whereas the time above paclitaxel plasma concentration of 0.05 to 0.2 μmol/L ( t C > 0.05−0.2...
Saved in:
Published in: | Clinical cancer research Vol. 13; no. 21; pp. 6410 - 6418 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Philadelphia, PA
American Association for Cancer Research
01-11-2007
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Purpose: Paclitaxel and carboplatin are frequently used in advanced ovarian cancer following cytoreductive surgery. Threshold models
have been used to predict paclitaxel pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamics, whereas the time above paclitaxel plasma concentration
of 0.05 to 0.2 μmol/L ( t C > 0.05−0.2 ) predicts neutropenia. The objective of this study was to build a population pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model of paclitaxel/carboplatin
in ovarian cancer patients.
Experimental Design: One hundred thirty-nine ovarian cancer patients received paclitaxel (175 mg/m 2 ) over 3 h followed by carboplatin area under the concentration-time curve 5 mg/mL*min over 30 min. Plasma concentration-time
data were measured, and data were processed using nonlinear mixed-effect modeling. Semiphysiologic models with linear or sigmoidal
maximum response and threshold models were adapted to the data.
Results: One hundred five patients had complete pharmacokinetic and toxicity data. In 34 patients with measurable disease, objective
response rate was 76%. Neutrophil and thrombocyte counts were adequately described by an inhibitory linear response model.
Paclitaxel t C > 0.05 was significantly higher in patients with a complete (91.8 h) or partial (76.3 h) response compared with patients with progressive
disease (31.5 h; P = 0.02 and 0.05, respectively). Patients with paclitaxel t C > 0.05 > 61.4 h (mean value) had a longer time to disease progression compared with patients with paclitaxel t C > 0.05 < 61.4 h (89.0 versus 61.9 weeks; P = 0.05). Paclitaxel t C > 0.05 was a good predictor for severe neutropenia ( P = 0.01), whereas carboplatin exposure ( C max and area under the concentration-time curve) was the best predictor for thrombocytopenia ( P < 10 −4 ).
Conclusions: In this group of patients, paclitaxel t C > 0.05 is a good predictive marker for severe neutropenia and clinical outcome, whereas carboplatin exposure is a good predictive
marker for thrombocytopenia. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 1078-0432 1557-3265 1557-3265 |
DOI: | 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-0064 |