Optimization of carbon dioxide (CO2) captured and distribution for enhanced oil recovery

In Indonesia, there are many power plants either owned by PLN or private company (non PLN) with varying electricity. The production of electricity will incur environment negative impact due to carbon footprint. As pollutant or byproduct, carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) has economical potential becoming a raw...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Published in:	2017 International Conference on Advanced Mechatronics, Intelligent Manufacture, and Industrial Automation (ICAMIMIA) pp. 141 - 145
Main Authors:	Biyanto, Totok R., Jaswadi, Khalil, M., Setiawan, H., Gabriella, P. D., Setiyawan, D., Utomo, A.P., Triastutik, E., Wibawa, A.
Format:	Conference Proceeding
Language:	English
Published:	IEEE 01-10-2017
Subjects:	CO 2 captured Companies Enhanced oil recovery Mathematical model Oils Optimization Pipelines Power generation Production Sinks Sources
Online Access:	Get full text
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

Description
Summary:	In Indonesia, there are many power plants either owned by PLN or private company (non PLN) with varying electricity. The production of electricity will incur environment negative impact due to carbon footprint. As pollutant or byproduct, carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) has economical potential becoming a raw material or other industrial process such as enhanced oil recovery (EOR). CO 2 EOR is an effort to enhance oil recovery by injecting CO 2 at tertiary stage of oil production. CO 2 EOR can be applied in Indonesia, because there are a lot of power plants (sources) and oil companies (sinks), especially in East Java. It has possibility to transport CO 2 from power plants to oil companies through pipelines. However, it required cost of CO 2 capture, pipelines and EOR facilities. The cost depends on the amount of CO 2 demand and supply, distance and technologies. Therefore, it should be optimized due to variation in the amount of CO 2 and distance. The optimization variables are pipelines path and CO 2 captured mass flowrate. There are 7 CO 2 sources with different both capacities and locations. On the other hand, there are 7 oil companies (sinks) with different CO 2 injection demand. Optimization result shows minimum CAPEX and OPEX. The CAPEX and OPEX values of each source depend on the distance between source and sink as well as the amount of CO 2 mass flowrate. The chosen sources of captured CO 2 are source 1, 3, 4 and 7. The remaining sources are not utilized due to cost consideration.
DOI:	10.1109/ICAMIMIA.2017.8387574