Cost Utility Analysis of an After-School Sports Sampling Program

Purpose The purposes of this study are to describe the costs of implementing an after-school physical activity intervention in three diverse, low-resourced, schools and to understand the potential aerobic impact of this program by cost. Design We conducted a cost utilization study from an 8.5-month...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:American journal of health promotion Vol. 38; no. 2; pp. 161 - 166
Main Authors: Lightner, Joseph S., Valleroy, Ella, Todd, Reagan, Eighmy, Katlyn E., Grimes, Amanda
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Los Angeles, CA SAGE Publications 01-02-2024
American Journal of Health Promotion
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Purpose The purposes of this study are to describe the costs of implementing an after-school physical activity intervention in three diverse, low-resourced, schools and to understand the potential aerobic impact of this program by cost. Design We conducted a cost utilization study from an 8.5-month physical activity intervention. Setting Three diverse, low-resourced, middle schools in the Midwest; The sample (N = 178) were mostly males (52.2%), African American or Black (54.8%), and divided between 6th, 7th, and 8th grades. Method Costs were collected from contracts, invoices, payroll, and receipts. Metabolic equivalents were collected from past literature. Costs/MET-hour were calculated for the schools and entire program by dividing costs by total MET-hours engaged in physical activity. Results Costs were $2.51/MET-hour, $8.96/MET-hour, and $10.73/MET-hour for the three schools. On average, the intervention had a cost of $4.73/MET-hour. Conclusions Cost/MET-hour for the present study is comparable or lower than other school-based physical activity interventions that require additional staff time and programming outside of standard classroom activities. Scale-up of after-school programs may be one way to improve the costs of programs in both schools and districts.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0890-1171
2168-6602
2168-6602
DOI:10.1177/08901171231210386