Evidence that haloperidol impairs learning and motivation scores in a probabilistic task by reducing the reward expectation
Activation of midbrain dopamine neurons in response to positive prediction errors and reward predictive cues is proposed to “energize” reward seeking behaviors and approach responses to places where the reward is expected. In the present study, we tested the effect of the D2-dopamine receptor antago...
Saved in:
| Published in: | Behavioural brain research Vol. 395; p. 112858 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
| Format: | Journal Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Netherlands
Elsevier B.V
01-10-2020
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | Get full text |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | Activation of midbrain dopamine neurons in response to positive prediction errors and reward predictive cues is proposed to “energize” reward seeking behaviors and approach responses to places where the reward is expected. In the present study, we tested the effect of the D2-dopamine receptor antagonist haloperidol on response latencies to enter two arms of a Y-maze with different reward probabilities. Adult male Wistar rats were trained to explore the Y-maze with sucrose pellets placed 30% of times at the end of one arm and 70% of times at the opposite arm. Therefore, the reward expectation was different among arms, and was updated in the trials when the reward was omitted. After training, rats received 0.05, 0.10, 0.15 mg/kg haloperidol, or saline 30 min before the test session. In the last, but not in the first trials, haloperidol caused a dose-dependent increase in arm choice latency and response latency. Saline, but not haloperidol, treated rats presented significantly longer response latencies for the 30% compared to the 70% reward probability arm. Haloperidol also caused a dose-dependent decrease in the number of entries in the 70% reward probability arm, increased the number of non-responses, and caused a dose-dependent increase in the number of re-entries in the 30% reward probability arm after non-rewarded trials. Control experiments suggested that haloperidol did not cause motor impairment or satiation, but rather impaired learning and motivation scores by reducing the reward expectation. |
|---|---|
| Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
| ISSN: | 0166-4328 1872-7549 |
| DOI: | 10.1016/j.bbr.2020.112858 |