Prospective evaluation of dietary and lifestyle pattern indices with risk of colorectal cancer in a cohort of younger women

Although colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence in the USA is declining overall, its incidence is increasing among those younger than 50 years of age. The reasons underlying the increasing trend are largely unknown, although behavioral changes, such as unhealthy diet and lifestyle factors, may be partial...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Annals of oncology Vol. 32; no. 6; pp. 778 - 786
Main Authors: Yue, Y., Hur, J., Cao, Y., Tabung, F.K., Wang, M., Wu, K., Song, M., Zhang, X., Liu, Y., Meyerhardt, J.A., Ng, K., Smith-Warner, S.A., Willett, W.C., Giovannucci, E.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: England Elsevier Ltd 01-06-2021
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Although colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence in the USA is declining overall, its incidence is increasing among those younger than 50 years of age. The reasons underlying the increasing trend are largely unknown, although behavioral changes, such as unhealthy diet and lifestyle factors, may be partially responsible. A prospective cohort study included 94 217 women aged 26-45 years at baseline. Validated anthropometric measures and lifestyle information were self-reported biennially. Exposures were four recommendation-based dietary indices—the prime diet quality score and three plant-based dietary indices; and two mechanism-based indices—the empirical dietary and lifestyle index for hyperinsulinemia (EDIH and ELIH). We calculated hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for overall CRC and for early-onset (before age 50) and after age 50 CRC separately. We documented 332 cases of CRC during 24 years of follow-up (2 113 655 person-years), with an average age of 52 ± 7 years at diagnosis. Hyperinsulinemic dietary and lifestyle patterns were associated with a higher risk of CRC. Multivariable-adjusted HRs (95% CIs) comparing participants in the highest versus lowest quartile were: 1.67 for EDIH (95% CI: 1.15-2.44, P-trend = 0.01) and 1.51 for ELIH (95% CI: 1.10-2.08, P-trend = 0.01). Moreover, per 75% increment in rank, ELIH appeared to be a stronger risk factor for early-onset CRC (HR = 1.86, 95% CI: 1.12-3.07) than after age 50 CRC (HR = 1.20, 95% CI: 0.83-1.73, P-heterogeneity = 0.16). The four recommendation-based indices were not significantly associated with overall, early-onset, or after age 50 CRC risk (per 75% increment in rank, HRs ranged from 0.75 to 1.28). Dietary and lifestyle patterns contributing to hyperinsulinemia were associated with greater CRC risk in younger women. Moreover, the hyperinsulinemic lifestyle showed a suggestively stronger positive association with early-onset CRC risk, compared with after age 50 CRC. Our findings suggest that dietary and lifestyle interventions to reduce insulinemic potential may be effective for CRC prevention among younger women. •Dietary and lifestyle patterns contributing to hyperinsulinemia were associated with higher colorectal cancer (CRC) risk in the young population.•The hyperinsulinemic lifestyle showed an even stronger positive association with early-onset CRC (age <50 at diagnosis) risk.•We elucidated the potential of modifiable factors for preventing early-onset CRC.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Supervision: SSW, WW, and ELG
Administrative, technical, or material support: SSW, WW, and ELG
Concept and design: YY, SSW, WW, and ELG
We would also like to thank the participants and staff of the Nurses’ Health Study II for their valuable contributions as well as the following state cancer registries for their help: AL, AZ, AR, CA, CO, CT, DE, FL, GA, ID, IL, IN, IA, KY, LA, ME, MD, MA, MI, NE, NH, NJ, NY, NC, ND, OH, OK, OR, PA, RI, SC, TN, TX, VA, WA, WY. Also, we would like to appreciate Boyang Cai for technical support.
Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: YY, JH, YC, SSW, WW, and ELG
Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: all authors
Equal contribution as last authors
Statistical analysis: YY, YC
Additional Contributions
Drafting of the manuscript: YY and JH
Author Contributions
We would like to thank the participants and staff of the Nurses’ Health Study II for their valuable contributions as well as the following state cancer registries for their help: AL, AZ, AR, CA, CO, CT, DE, FL, GA, ID, IL, IN, IA, KY, LA, ME, MD, MA, MI, NE, NH, NJ, NY, NC, ND, OH, OK, OR, PA, RI, SC, TN, TX, VA, WA, WY. The authors assume full responsibility for analyses and interpretation of these data
ISSN:0923-7534
1569-8041
DOI:10.1016/j.annonc.2021.03.200