Police Evaluations of Intimate Partner Violence in Heterosexual and Same-Sex Relationships: Do Experience and Training Play a Role?

In recent years, law enforcement agencies have enhanced intimate partner violence (IPV) policies and increased the frequency of required training. Yet, there is limited research that addresses how experience and training are related to evaluations of heterosexual and same-sex disputants in an IPV in...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Published in:	Journal of police and criminal psychology Vol. 34; no. 1; pp. 34 - 44
Main Authors:	Russell, Brenda, Sturgeon, John A. (Drew)
Format:	Journal Article
Language:	English
Published:	New York Springer US 01-03-2019 Springer Nature B.V
Subjects:	Arrests Behavioral Science and Psychology College students Criminology and Criminal Justice Dating Domestic violence Experience Females Gays & lesbians Gender Gender identity Heterosexuality Homophobia Homosexuality Injuries Intimate partner violence Law and Psychology Law enforcement Law enforcement agencies Legitimacy Medical referrals Minority & ethnic groups Mounted police Official misconduct Police Police training Psychology Referrals Severity Sex crimes Sexual orientation Training Variables Victims Training Same sex Experience Arrest Injury Evaluations Sexual minorities Gender Police Non-arrest LGBT Officer
Online Access:	Get full text
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

Description
Summary:	In recent years, law enforcement agencies have enhanced intimate partner violence (IPV) policies and increased the frequency of required training. Yet, there is limited research that addresses how experience and training are related to evaluations of heterosexual and same-sex disputants in an IPV incident. This research investigates how officers perceive heterosexual and same-sex disputants in IPV incidents and examines how officer experience, frequency, and recency of required IPV training affect evaluations. Law enforcement officers ( n = 309) across 27 states responded to a hypothetical scenario of an IPV incident between a heterosexual or same-sex couple. Dependent variables included perpetrator and victim arrest, perceived fairness of non-arrest options, willingness to provide referrals for perpetrator and victim, and severity of victim injury. Officers believed that the use of some non-arrest options was fairer when the perpetrator was a gay male or heterosexual female and there were no significant effects for arrest options. Referrals to a domestic violence hotline and injury severity varied by perpetrator and victim gender and sexual orientation. While officer experience played a role in non-arrest options, frequency and recency of officer training were not related to dependent variables of interest. Officers embrace evaluations of IPV that demonstrate differential evaluations of the incident as a result of gender and sexual orientation. These evaluations may have implications for the legitimacy of claims and safety and justice for victims and officers.
ISSN:	0882-0783 1936-6469
DOI:	10.1007/s11896-018-9279-8