Screening for atrial fibrillation in the community: A multicenter validation trial
Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is an important public health problem. This arrhythmia is common and associated with a high risk of stroke. Further, appropriate interventions in AF can reduce the risk of stroke by approximately 68%. Population studies show that a large group of patients have in...
Saved in:
| Published in: | Journal of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases Vol. 8; no. 2; pp. 99 - 103 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Journal Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
United States
Elsevier Inc
01-03-1999
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | Get full text |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is an important public health problem. This arrhythmia is common and associated with a high risk of stroke. Further, appropriate interventions in AF can reduce the risk of stroke by approximately 68%. Population studies show that a large group of patients have intermittent or chronic AF that remains unrecognized. If a simple screening test for this arrhythmia could be developed and validated, application of the technique across populations might identify AF patients for early treatment, potentially reducing the incidence of stroke. In this study, we sought to determine whether individuals taken from the general community could be taught to find and classify the pulse of another as very irregular, implying AF, or regular, implying normal sinus rhythm (NSR). The aim was to establish that pulse examination for potential AF could be performed by individuals with sufficient sensitivity and specificity to be effectively used as a screening procedure for this medically important arrhythmia.
Methods: We enrolled 178 subjects selected from the general community from four centers. Subjects received standardized education on the medical importance of AF and its signature, a very irregular pulse. A technique for palpating and characterizing the rhythm of the radial pulse was also taught. Without further coaching, subjects were then asked to find their pulse and then to find and classify the pulse of two models randomly presented who may or may not have had AF.
Results: Of the 178 subjects tested, 92% were able to find their own pulse; 17 (9.6%) were unable to find the pulse of one or both patient models and were, therefore, excluded from the study. Of the remaining 161 subjects, 76% (122 of 161) correctly identified the pulse in an AF model, and 86% (139 of 161) correctly identified the pulse in an NSR model. Results did not statistically differ as a function of age, educational status, or location.
Discussion: This multicenter trial established that given minimal standardized instructions, subjects from the general community can reliably and consistently find both their pulse as well as the pulse of another and to differentiate a regular pulse from a very irregular pulse. If similar educational programs were widely applied across large populations, periodic screening for AF might lead to earlier diagnosis and appropriate treatment for patients who have this major risk factor for stroke. These screening programs should be focused on the population over the age of 55 where the risk of stroke in AF increases with each decade. |
|---|---|
| Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
| ISSN: | 1052-3057 1532-8511 |
| DOI: | 10.1016/S1052-3057(99)80063-9 |