Effect of state legislation prohibiting denial of emergency department patient claims

Study objective: On July 1, 1996, two Florida state laws were implemented to prevent denial of legitimate patient claims. Our objective was to determine whether the laws have been effective in reducing inappropriate denials as measured by the proportion of claims and charges denied. Methods: A compr...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Published in:	Annals of emergency medicine Vol. 35; no. 3; pp. 267 - 271
Main Authors:	Seaberg, David C., Stimler, John E., Wears, Robert L.
Format:	Journal Article Conference Proceeding
Language:	English
Published:	New York, NY Mosby, Inc 01-03-2000 Elsevier
Subjects:	Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy Biological and medical sciences Emergency and intensive care: techniques, logistics Emergency Service, Hospital - economics Emergency Service, Hospital - legislation & jurisprudence Emergency Service, Hospital - statistics & numerical data Florida Humans Insurance Claim Review - economics Insurance Claim Review - legislation & jurisprudence Insurance Claim Review - statistics & numerical data Insurance, Health, Reimbursement - economics Intensive care medicine Intensive care unit. Emergency transport systems. Emergency, hospital ward Medical sciences Statistics, Nonparametric Florida Human Payment State Legislation Hospital ward Denial Emergency Public health
Online Access:	Get full text
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

Description
Summary:	Study objective: On July 1, 1996, two Florida state laws were implemented to prevent denial of legitimate patient claims. Our objective was to determine whether the laws have been effective in reducing inappropriate denials as measured by the proportion of claims and charges denied. Methods: A comprehensive set of claims for in-state emergency physician services from a physician billing company were analyzed for the period January 1996 through June 1997, covering 6 months before and 12 months after the effective date of state legislation. The number of facilities included in the data varied from 55 to 67 (mean 63). Denials were classified into 6 categories by payer type. Gross denials were those claims that were completely not paid by the payer, net denials represented the amount denied after patient payments. Downcoding was not examined in this study. Main outcome measures were the proportion of claims and charges denied before and after July 1, 1996. Results: The classification of relative proportions of primary payers did not change appreciably over the study period. The proportion of denied claims decreased significantly (Kruskal-Wallis P <.001), starting 2 months after implementation. Conclusion: After initiation of state legislation, payers continue to inappropriately deny claims, although the number of claims and total charges denied has decreased. In response to this legislation, payers are denying larger claims and patient copayments have increased. [Seaberg DC, Stimler JE, Wears RL. Effect of state legislation prohibiting denial of emergency department patient claims. Ann Emerg Med. March 2000;35:267-271.]
Bibliography:	ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23
ISSN:	0196-0644 1097-6760
DOI:	10.1016/S0196-0644(00)70078-3