Factors Associated With Consciousness Recovery Time After Liver Transplantation in Recipients With Hepatic Encephalopathy
Abstract Background Hepatic encephalopathy (HE) occurs as a result of liver failure and is often considered to be a clinical indication for liver transplantation (LT). An assessment of post-transplantation consciousness level in recipients with HE is crucial, because recovery of consciousness implie...
Saved in:
Published in: | Transplantation proceedings Vol. 46; no. 3; pp. 712 - 715 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
United States
Elsevier Inc
01-04-2014
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Abstract Background Hepatic encephalopathy (HE) occurs as a result of liver failure and is often considered to be a clinical indication for liver transplantation (LT). An assessment of post-transplantation consciousness level in recipients with HE is crucial, because recovery of consciousness implies reestablishment of transplant liver function and lack of perioperative brain damage. The purpose of this study is to evaluate factors associated with consciousness recovery time after LT in recipients with HE. Methods Out of 633 adult recipients who underwent LT, recipients who exhibited HE at the time of LT were analyzed retrospectively. The time between graft reperfusion and postoperative consciousness recovery was determined, and recipients were divided into 2 groups: group E with recovery of consciousness early (≤48 hours), and group L with recovery of consciousness late (>48 hours). Analyzed variables included recipient sex, age, graft type, Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score, HE history/duration/type/grade, and preoperative laboratory values, including blood ammonia concentration. Results HE was present at the time of LT in 69 (10.9%) of 633 recipients. Among the 69 recipients, 11 recipients who died or underwent reoperation before consciousness recovery were excluded, and 58 recipients (group E: n = 32; group L: n = 26) were enrolled into analysis. Multivariate analysis showed that HE duration >5 days (odds ratio [OR], 15.58; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.35–179.56; P = .028) and HE type C (OR, 30.90; 95% CI, 1.67–573.48; P = .021) were the independent factors associated with late recovery from HE after LT. Conclusions We suggest that recipients with long-duration or type C HE should be carefully managed during the post-transplantation period to prevent deterioration of HE. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0041-1345 1873-2623 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.transproceed.2013.12.031 |