Sum of skinfolds measurement can be used in the estimation of total body fat in patients with chronic kidney disease undergoing hemodialysis

Introduction: body fat reflects important clinical impacts among hemodialysis patients; thus, simple and safe methods are required for a careful evaluation of this body compartment. Objectives: to evaluate the concordance of estimates of total body fat percentage (%BF), calculated using bioelectrica...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Nutrición hospitalaria : organo oficial de la Sociedad Española de Nutrición Parenteral y Enteral Vol. 38; no. 1; pp. 94 - 99
Main Authors: Melo, Dejane de Almeida, Hortegal, Elane Viana Furtado, Guimarães, Alana Caroline Amorim de Miranda, França, Ana Karina Teixeira da Cunha, Alves, Janete Janete Daniel Alencar, Santos, Elisângela Milhomem Dos, Silva, Thanara da Conceição da, Silva, Jacqueline Carvalho Galvão da, Nunes, Liliane Carvalho Rodrigues, Carvalho, Suena Cristina Rodrigues de, Sousa, Laís Ferreira de, Nunes, Rafael Ferreira, Dias, Raimunda Sheyla Carneiro, Santos, Alcione Miranda Dos
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Spain Grupo Arán 23-02-2021
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Introduction: body fat reflects important clinical impacts among hemodialysis patients; thus, simple and safe methods are required for a careful evaluation of this body compartment. Objectives: to evaluate the concordance of estimates of total body fat percentage (%BF), calculated using bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) and sum of four skinfolds (SSKD) measures, with those obtained using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) receiving hemodialysis. Methods: a cross-sectional study was conducted in 317 patients undergoing hemodialysis. The %BF was evaluated using BIA, SSKD measurement, and DEXA, and stratified by sex and tertiles. The Wilcoxon test for paired samples was used to compare the %BF obtained using the different methods, and Lin's concordance correlation coefficient (CCC-L) to evaluate concordance. Results: the average %BF estimated using DEXA was 29.3 ± 9.3 %, with significant differences among the three methods (p < 0.05). SSKD measurement presented a higher CCC-L concordance with DEXA, regardless of sex. After stratification of the sample in tertiles, BIA presented a higher CCC-L concordance with DEXA among the patients with CKD with a %BF above 34.4 % (third tertile). Conversely, SSKD measurement presented better concordance with DEXA for those with a %BF equal to or less than 34.4 %. Conclusions: in terms of the estimates of the %BF, SSKD measurement displayed a better concordance with DEXA.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0212-1611
1699-5198
1699-5198
DOI:10.20960/nh.03338