Quality of life and functional outcome following anterior or abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer

The aims of the study were (1) to evaluate quality of life (QoL) and functional outcome in patients following anterior resection (AR) or abdominoperineal resection (APR) for rectal cancer, and (2) whether these outcomes were dependent on the level of anastomosis. Patients who were without recurrent...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Published in:	European journal of surgical oncology Vol. 31; no. 7; pp. 735 - 742
Main Authors:	Guren, M.G., Eriksen, M.T., Wiig, J.N., Carlsen, E., Nesbakken, A., Sigurdsson, H.K., Wibe, A., Tveit, K.M.
Format:	Journal Article
Language:	English
Published:	England Elsevier Ltd 01-09-2005
Subjects:	Abdominoperineal resection Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Anastomosis, Surgical Anterior resection Body Image Digestive System Surgical Procedures - adverse effects Digestive System Surgical Procedures - methods Fecal Incontinence Female Follow-Up Studies Functional outcome Humans Male Middle Aged Neoplasm Metastasis Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - surgery Postoperative Complications Quality of Life Rectal cancer Rectal Neoplasms - complications Rectal Neoplasms - pathology Rectal Neoplasms - psychology Rectal Neoplasms - surgery Registries - statistics & numerical data Sexual Dysfunction, Physiological Treatment Outcome Abdominoperineal resection Rectal cancer Anterior resection Quality of life Functional outcome
Online Access:	Get full text
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

Description
Summary:	The aims of the study were (1) to evaluate quality of life (QoL) and functional outcome in patients following anterior resection (AR) or abdominoperineal resection (APR) for rectal cancer, and (2) whether these outcomes were dependent on the level of anastomosis. Patients who were without recurrent or metastatic disease were identified from the Norwegian Rectal Cancer Registry. QoL was assessed by the EORTC questionnaires QLQ-C30 and QLQ-CR38, and rectal function by a short questionnaire. Of 319 patients studied, 229 had undergone AR and 90 APR. The median age was 73 years, and the median time since surgery was 64 months. Mean QoL scores for body image and male sexual problems were better following AR than APR (P<0.01), also in patients with a low (≤3cm) anastomosis. Patients who had undergone AR had higher mean scores for constipation (P<0.001) and more often used anti-diarrhoeal medication (P=0.005), than patients who had undergone APR. Patients with a low anastomosis (≤3cm) had more incontinence for gas and solid stools (P<0.05), and had more incontinence (P=0.006) compared with patients with higher anastomosis, but there was no difference in QoL. Subgroup analysis showed that irradiated patients (n=34) had worse rectal function in terms of frequency, urgency, and incontinence (P<0.01). Although rectal function was impaired in patients with low anastomosis, patients who had undergone AR had better QoL than patients who had undergone APR.
Bibliography:	ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23
ISSN:	0748-7983 1532-2157
DOI:	10.1016/j.ejso.2005.05.004