Search Results - "Sickles, EA"

Refine Results
  1. 1

    Performance parameters for screening and diagnostic mammography: specialist and general radiologists by Sickles, Edward A, Wolverton, Dulcy E, Dee, Katherine E

    Published in Radiology (01-09-2002)
    “…To evaluate performance parameters for radiologists in a practice of breast imaging specialists and general diagnostic radiologists who interpret a large…”
    Get more information
    Journal Article
  2. 2
  3. 3

    Mammographic characteristics of 115 missed cancers later detected with screening mammography and the potential utility of computer-aided detection by Birdwell, R L, Ikeda, D M, O'Shaughnessy, K F, Sickles, E A

    Published in Radiology (01-04-2001)
    “…To retrospectively determine the mammographic characteristics of cancers missed at screening mammography and assess the ability of computer-aided detection…”
    Get more information
    Journal Article
  4. 4

    Comparison of Screening Mammography in the United States and the United Kingdom by Smith-Bindman, Rebecca, Chu, Philip W, Miglioretti, Diana L, Sickles, Edward A, Blanks, Roger, Ballard-Barbash, Rachel, Bobo, Janet K, Lee, Nancy C, Wallis, Matthew G, Patnick, Julietta, Kerlikowske, Karla

    “…CONTEXT Screening mammography differs between the United States and the United Kingdom; a direct comparison may suggest methods to improve the practice…”
    Get full text
    Journal Article
  5. 5

    Performance benchmarks for diagnostic mammography by Sickles, Edward A, Miglioretti, Diana L, Ballard-Barbash, Rachel, Geller, Berta M, Leung, Jessica W T, Rosenberg, Robert D, Smith-Bindman, Rebecca, Yankaskas, Bonnie C

    Published in Radiology (01-06-2005)
    “…To evaluate a range of performance parameters pertinent to the comprehensive auditing of diagnostic mammography examinations, and to derive performance…”
    Get more information
    Journal Article
  6. 6

    Effect of age, breast density, and family history on the sensitivity of first screening mammography by Kerlikowske, Karla, Grady, Deborah, Barclay, John, Sickles, Edward A, Ernster, Virginia

    “…Kerlikowske et al determined factors that influence the sensitivity of modern first screening mammography. The sensitivity of modern mammography is highest…”
    Get full text
    Journal Article
  7. 7

    Follow-up of palpable circumscribed noncalcified solid breast masses at mammography and US: can biopsy be averted? by Graf, Oswald, Helbich, Thomas H, Fuchsjaeger, Michael H, Hopf, Gottfried, Morgun, Margarita, Graf, Claudia, Mallek, Reinhold, Sickles, Edward A

    Published in Radiology (01-12-2004)
    “…To determine whether palpable noncalcified solid breast masses with benign morphology at mammography and ultrasonography (US) can be managed similarly to…”
    Get more information
    Journal Article
  8. 8

    Physician Predictors of Mammographic Accuracy by Smith-Bindman, Rebecca, Chu, Philip, Miglioretti, Diana L., Quale, Chris, Rosenberg, Robert D., Cutter, Gary, Geller, Berta, Bacchetti, Peter, Sickles, Edward A., Kerlikowske, Karla

    “…Background: The association between physician experience and the accuracy of screening mammography in community practice is not well studied. We identified…”
    Get full text
    Journal Article
  9. 9

    Potential contribution of computer-aided detection to the sensitivity of screening mammography by Warren Burhenne, L J, Wood, S A, D'Orsi, C J, Feig, S A, Kopans, D B, O'Shaughnessy, K F, Sickles, E A, Tabar, L, Vyborny, C J, Castellino, R A

    Published in Radiology (01-05-2000)
    “…To determine the false-negative rate in screening mammography, the capability of computer-aided detection (CAD) to identify these missed lesions, and whether…”
    Get more information
    Journal Article
  10. 10

    Mammographic features of 300 consecutive nonpalpable breast cancers by Sickles, EA

    Published in American journal of roentgenology (1976) (01-04-1986)
    “…The mammographic presentations of 300 consecutive nonpalpable breast cancers were analyzed to more clearly define the spectrum of radiographic signs needed to…”
    Get full text
    Journal Article
  11. 11

    Association of Volume and Volume-Independent Factors With Accuracy in Screening Mammogram Interpretation by Beam, Craig A., Conant, Emily F., Sickles, Edward A.

    “…Background: Early detection of breast cancer is associated with the accurate reading of screening mammograms, but factors that influence reading accuracy are…”
    Get full text
    Journal Article
  12. 12

    Abstract P2-01-01: Impact of California breast density notification law SB 1538 on California women and their health care providers by Ikeda, DM, Thomas, WR, Joe, BN, Lindfors, K, Brenner, RJ, Feig, S, Bassett, LW, Leung, JW, Ojeda-Fournier, H, Hargreaves, J, Price, E, Lipson, J, Kurian, AW, Love, E, Walgenbach, DD, Ryan, L, Durbin, M, Daniel, BL, Nayak, L, Sickles, EA

    Published in Cancer research (Chicago, Ill.) (15-12-2013)
    “…Abstract Purpose: To describe the impact of California Breast Density Notification law (SB 1538) on policy development, policy implementation and supplemental…”
    Get full text
    Journal Article
  13. 13

    Dynamic High-Spatial-Resolution MR Imaging of Suspicious Breast Lesions: Diagnostic Criteria and Interobserver Variability by Kinkel, Karen, Helbich, Thomas H, Esserman, Laura J, Barclay, John, Schwerin, Ellen H, Sickles, Edward A, Hylton, Nola M

    Published in American journal of roentgenology (1976) (01-07-2000)
    “…Our study was undertaken to develop diagnostic rules and to assess the reproducibility of dynamic and morphologic parameters for the characterization of…”
    Get full text
    Journal Article
  14. 14

    Variability and Accuracy in Mammographic Interpretation Using the American College of Radiology Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System by Kerlikowske, Karla, Grady, Deborah, Barclay, John, Ernster, Virginia, Frankel, Steven D., Ominsky, Steven H., Sickles, Edward A.

    “…Background: Several studies, which were limited by their small sample size and selection of difficult cases for review, have reported substantial variability…”
    Get full text
    Journal Article
  15. 15

    Periodic mammographic follow-up of probably benign lesions: results in 3,184 consecutive cases by Sickles, E A

    Published in Radiology (01-05-1991)
    “…The author prospectively evaluated the value of periodic mammographic surveillance among 3,184 consecutive cases of nonpalpable, probably benign breast lesions…”
    Get more information
    Journal Article
  16. 16

    Differential Value of Comparison with Previous Examinations in Diagnostic Versus Screening Mammography by Burnside, Elizabeth S, Sickles, Edward A, Sohlich, Rita E, Dee, Katherine E

    Published in American journal of roentgenology (1976) (01-11-2002)
    “…The purpose of our study was to analyze the differences in clinical outcomes of diagnostic and screening mammography depending on whether comparison is made…”
    Get full text
    Journal Article
  17. 17

    Mammographic features of "early" breast cancer by Sickles, EA

    Published in American journal of roentgenology (1976) (01-09-1984)
    “…Mammographic detection of breast cancer at the earliest possible stage requires optimal radiographic technique and a full knowledge of the subtle features with…”
    Get full text
    Journal Article
  18. 18
  19. 19

    Computer-aided detection output on 172 subtle findings on normal mammograms previously obtained in women with breast cancer detected at follow-up screening mammography by Ikeda, Debra M, Birdwell, Robyn L, O'Shaughnessy, Kathryn F, Sickles, Edward A, Brenner, R James

    Published in Radiology (01-03-2004)
    “…To evaluate, by using a computer-aided detection (CAD) program, the nonspecific findings on normal screening mammograms obtained in women in whom breast cancer…”
    Get more information
    Journal Article
  20. 20

    Breast imaging: from 1965 to the present by Sickles, E A

    Published in Radiology (01-04-2000)
    “…The current state of the art for breast imaging is reviewed in comparison with the methods of practice commonly in use 25-35 years ago to demonstrate the most…”
    Get more information
    Journal Article