Could ChatGPT get an Engineering Degree? Evaluating Higher Education Vulnerability to AI Assistants

AI assistants are being increasingly used by students enrolled in higher education institutions. While these tools provide opportunities for improved teaching and education, they also pose significant challenges for assessment and learning outcomes. We conceptualize these challenges through the lens...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors:	Borges, Beatriz, Foroutan, Negar, Bayazit, Deniz, Sotnikova, Anna, Montariol, Syrielle, Nazaretzky, Tanya, Banaei, Mohammadreza, Sakhaeirad, Alireza, Servant, Philippe, Neshaei, Seyed Parsa, Frej, Jibril, Romanou, Angelika, Weiss, Gail, Mamooler, Sepideh, Chen, Zeming, Fan, Simin, Gao, Silin, Ismayilzada, Mete, Paul, Debjit, Schöpfer, Alexandre, Janchevski, Andrej, Tiede, Anja, Linden, Clarence, Troiani, Emanuele, Salvi, Francesco, Behrens, Freya, Orsi, Giacomo, Piccioli, Giovanni, Sevel, Hadrien, Coulon, Louis, Pineros-Rodriguez, Manuela, Bonnassies, Marin, Hellich, Pierre, van Gerwen, Puck, Gambhir, Sankalp, Pirelli, Solal, Blanchard, Thomas, Callens, Timothée, Aoun, Toni Abi, Alonso, Yannick Calvino, Cho, Yuri, Chiappa, Alberto, Sclocchi, Antonio, Bruno, Étienne, Hofhammer, Florian, Pescia, Gabriel, Rizk, Geovani, Dadi, Leello, Stoffl, Lucas, Ribeiro, Manoel Horta, Bovel, Matthieu, Pan, Yueyang, Radenovic, Aleksandra, Alahi, Alexandre, Mathis, Alexander, Bitbol, Anne-Florence, Faltings, Boi, Hébert, Cécile, Tuia, Devis, Maréchal, François, Candea, George, Carleo, Giuseppe, Chappelier, Jean-Cédric, Flammarion, Nicolas, Fürbringer, Jean-Marie, Pellet, Jean-Philippe, Aberer, Karl, Zdeborová, Lenka, Salathé, Marcel, Jaggi, Martin, Rajman, Martin, Payer, Mathias, Wyart, Matthieu, Gastpar, Michael, Ceriotti, Michele, Svensson, Ola, Lévêque, Olivier, Ienne, Paolo, Guerraoui, Rachid, West, Robert, Kashyap, Sanidhya, Piazza, Valerio, Simanis, Viesturs, Kuncak, Viktor, Cevher, Volkan, Schwaller, Philippe, Friedli, Sacha, Jermann, Patrick, Kaser, Tanja, Bosselut, Antoine
Format:	Journal Article
Language:	English
Published:	07-08-2024
Subjects:	Computer Science - Artificial Intelligence Computer Science - Computation and Language Computer Science - Computers and Society
Online Access:	Get full text
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

Description
Summary:	AI assistants are being increasingly used by students enrolled in higher education institutions. While these tools provide opportunities for improved teaching and education, they also pose significant challenges for assessment and learning outcomes. We conceptualize these challenges through the lens of vulnerability, the potential for university assessments and learning outcomes to be impacted by student use of generative AI. We investigate the potential scale of this vulnerability by measuring the degree to which AI assistants can complete assessment questions in standard university-level STEM courses. Specifically, we compile a novel dataset of textual assessment questions from 50 courses at EPFL and evaluate whether two AI assistants, GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 can adequately answer these questions. We use eight prompting strategies to produce responses and find that GPT-4 answers an average of 65.8% of questions correctly, and can even produce the correct answer across at least one prompting strategy for 85.1% of questions. When grouping courses in our dataset by degree program, these systems already pass non-project assessments of large numbers of core courses in various degree programs, posing risks to higher education accreditation that will be amplified as these models improve. Our results call for revising program-level assessment design in higher education in light of advances in generative AI.
DOI:	10.48550/arxiv.2408.11841