Influence of sleep bruxism severity on masticatory efficiency: electromyographic analysis

Influence of sleep bruxism severity on masticatory efficiency: electromyographic analysis

The objective of the present study was to ascertain masticatory efficiency by evaluating electromyographic activity in the masseter and temporalis muscles in subjects with sleep bruxism of varying severity, as determined by BiteStrip. Thirty-four subjects with sleep bruxism were divided into two gro...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Archives italiennes de biologie Vol. 157; no. 2-3; p. 59
Main Authors: Palinkas, M, Seidel Coscarella, L, Hirono Hotta, T, Bataglion, C, De Luca Canto, G, Corrêa de Mello, E, Maria Napolitano Gonçalves, L, Siéssere, S, Cecilio Hallak Regalo, S
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Italy 2019
Subjects:
Adult
Electromyography
Humans
Masseter Muscle
Mastication
Sleep Bruxism
Temporal Muscle
Young Adult
Electromyography
Sleep Bruxism
Masticatory Muscles
Masticatory Efficiency
Online Access:Get more information
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The objective of the present study was to ascertain masticatory efficiency by evaluating electromyographic activity in the masseter and temporalis muscles in subjects with sleep bruxism of varying severity, as determined by BiteStrip. Thirty-four subjects with sleep bruxism were divided into two groups: a mild sleep bruxism group with a mean (± standard deviation) age of 31.3 ± 6.2 years (n = 15) and a severe sleep bruxism group with a mean age of 29.8 ± 7.1 years (n = 19). Full-night polysomnography (PSG) was performed in eligible subjects. The linear envelope integral was used to determine masticatory efficiency on the basis of the electromyographic signal of the masseter and temporalis muscles during habitual and non-habitual chewing. There was significantly higher (p .05) electromyographic activity in the severe bruxism group than in the mild bruxism group during both peanut chewing in the right (p = .03) and left (p = .03) temporalis muscles and raisin chewing in the right (p = .01) and left (p = .05) temporalis muscles. Furthermore, Parafilm M chewing showed similar results in the right (p = .008) and left (p = .02) temporalis muscles. These results suggested that subjects with severe sleep bruxism had lower masticatory efficiency.
ISSN:0003-9829
DOI:10.12871/00039829201922