Oestrogen receptor pathway activity is associated with outcome in endometrial cancer

Background Oestrogen receptor (ER) expression is a prognostic biomarker in endometrial cancer (EC). However, expression does not provide information about the functional activity of the ER pathway. We evaluated a model to quantify ER pathway activity in EC, and determined the prognostic relevance of...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:British journal of cancer Vol. 123; no. 5; pp. 785 - 792
Main Authors: van Weelden, Willem Jan, van der Putten, Louis J. M., Inda, Márcia A., van Brussel, Anne, Snijders, Marc P. L. M., Schriever, Lisanne M. M., Bulten, Johan, Massuger, Leon F. A. G., van de Stolpe, Anja, Pijnenborg, Johanna M. A.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: London Nature Publishing Group UK 01-09-2020
Nature Publishing Group
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Background Oestrogen receptor (ER) expression is a prognostic biomarker in endometrial cancer (EC). However, expression does not provide information about the functional activity of the ER pathway. We evaluated a model to quantify ER pathway activity in EC, and determined the prognostic relevance of ER pathway activity. Methods ER pathway activity was measured in two publicly available datasets with endometrial and EC tissue, and one clinical cohort with 107 samples from proliferative and hyperplastic endometrium and endometrioid-type EC (EEC) and uterine serous cancer (USC). ER pathway activity scores were inferred from ER target gene mRNA levels from Affymetrix microarray data (public datasets), or measured by qPCR on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded samples (clinical cohort) and related to ER expression and outcome. Results ER pathway activity scores differed significantly throughout the menstrual cycle supporting the validity of the pathway test. The highest ER pathway scores were found in proliferative and hyperplastic endometrium and stage I EEC, whereas stage II–IV EEC and USCs had significantly lower levels. Low ER pathway activity was associated with recurrent disease, and added prognostic value in patients with low ER expression. Conclusion The ER pathway test reflects activity of the ER pathway, and may improve prediction of outcome in EC patients.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0007-0920
1532-1827
DOI:10.1038/s41416-020-0925-4