Application of the polymerase chain reaction to the epidemiology of pathogenic and nonpathogenic Entamoeba histolytica

We used the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to study the epidemiology of pathogenic and nonpathogenic Entamoeba histolytica in a rural community in Mexico. Formalin-fixed stool samples were used for extraction of DNA. The PCR amplifications were performed using two sets of primers that discriminate...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Published in:	The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene Vol. 48; no. 1; p. 58
Main Authors:	Acuna-Soto, R, Samuelson, J, De Girolami, P, Zarate, L, Millan-Velasco, F, Schoolnick, G, Wirth, D
Format:	Journal Article
Language:	English
Published:	United States 01-01-1993
Subjects:	Adolescent Adult Amebiasis - complications Animals Base Sequence Child Child, Preschool DNA, Protozoan - analysis DNA, Protozoan - chemistry Dysentery, Amebic - complications Dysentery, Amebic - epidemiology Dysentery, Amebic - parasitology Endolimax - isolation & purification Entamoeba histolytica - genetics Entamoeba histolytica - pathogenicity Feces - parasitology Female Humans Infant Male Mexico - epidemiology Middle Aged Molecular Sequence Data Oligodeoxyribonucleotides - chemistry Polymerase Chain Reaction Reproducibility of Results Rural Population Sensitivity and Specificity Mexico
Online Access:	Get more information
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

Description
Summary:	We used the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to study the epidemiology of pathogenic and nonpathogenic Entamoeba histolytica in a rural community in Mexico. Formalin-fixed stool samples were used for extraction of DNA. The PCR amplifications were performed using two sets of primers that discriminate between pathogenic or non-pathogenic E. histolytica. A total of 201 randomly selected individuals were studied. Among them, 25 (12%) were diagnosed to be infected with E. histolytica by microscopy; PCR identified 24 of these as positive (sensitivity = 0.96) and of 176 negative individuals, only three were identified as positive (specificity = 0.98). The PCR analysis defined three populations: 14 cases were positive for both pathogenic and nonpathogenic E. histolytica, nine cases were positive for pathogenic and negative for nonpathogenic E. histolytica, and only one case was negative for pathogenic and positive for nonpathogenic E. histolytica. Infection by E. histolytica was strongly associated to infection with Entamoeba coli (odds ratio [OR] = 9.41, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 3.09, 28.65, P < 0.0004) and Endolimax nana (OR = 6.15, 95% CI = 2.03, 18.17, P < 0.0004). This new technique has high specificity and sensitivity; it is simple, reproducible, fast, avoids the need to culture trophozoites, and can be applied in the field for epidemiologic studies.
ISSN:	0002-9637
DOI:	10.4269/ajtmh.1993.48.58